← Who bought my rep

Politician

Michelle Steel

Republican · California · ran 3 times since 2020, won 2 · incumbent

FEC candidate H0CA48198

Michelle Steel (Republican) raised $11M for the 2024 California 45th District race, $2.0M of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $5.2M for and $12M against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). They lost.

Raised, all cycles

$25M

2024, 2022, 2020; counted once per cycle

From PAC checks

16%

$3.9M from corporations, trade groups, unions and politicians

Outside money for

$5.6M

Super PACs and party groups helping

Outside money against

$23M

Spent attacking them

Every run

Each election and its result. Campaign receipts cover the whole cycle and can appear in both regular and special contests; they count once in the totals above.
CycleRaceRaisedPAC shareOutside for / againstGoogle adsAll moneyResult
2024California 45th District$11M18%$5.2M / $12M$418K$28M✗ Lost
2022California 45th District$7.4M20%$333K / $368K$150K$8.1M✓ Won
2020California 48th District$6.4M6%$129K / $10M$141K$17M✓ Won

Who wrote the checks

The PACs that gave the most across every run, and what kind of money it is.
Corporate $1.2MLeadership PAC $1.0MTrade group $558KOther $412KMembership $265KSuper PAC $160KParty $28KUnion $23K

Outside money, for and against

Super PACs and party groups that spent the most on these races.

Funding and votes

How their votes align with industry funding

Across 13 industry-vote comparisons with at least $10K in traced funding, they voted the industry's way 12 times (92%). This is a retrospective comparison using covered 2020–2026 runs; some money arrived after the vote. A vote can appear for multiple industries. Unknown coverage is excluded. “With industry” means its stated preferred side, and does not establish causation.
All issues →
VoteIndustryTheir money from itVoted
FIT21 (crypto market structure)House · 2024 · 279–136Crypto wanted yea$2KYea · with industry
Israel Security Assistance Support ActHouse · 2024 · 224–187Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$19KYea · with industry
SAB 121 repealHouse · 2024 · 228–182Crypto wanted yea$2KYea · with industry
Antisemitism Awareness ActHouse · 2024 · 320–91Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$19KYea · with industry
Israel security supplemental (Apr 2024)House · 2024 · 366–58Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$19KYea · with industry
Ukraine security supplementalHouse · 2024 · 311–112Defense contractors wanted yea$10KYea · with industry
Protecting Health Care for All Patients ActHouse · 2024 · 211–208Pharma and health care wanted yea$58KYea · with industry
Joint-employer rule repealHouse · 2024 · 206–177Labor unions wanted nay$25KYea · against
NDAA FY2024House · 2023 · 310–118Defense contractors wanted yea$10KYea · with industry
Israel aid (Nov 2023)House · 2023 · 226–196Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$19KYea · with industry
Pistol brace rule repealHouse · 2023 · 219–210Gun lobby wanted yea$15KYea · with industry
Lower Energy Costs ActHouse · 2023 · 225–204Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$65KYea · with industry
Strategic Production Response ActHouse · 2023 · 221–205Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$65KYea · with industry
Merger Filing Fee Modernization ActHouse · 2022 · 242–184Tech and AI wanted nay$1KNay · with industry
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 2022 · 220–207Oil, gas and coal wanted nayPharma and health care wanted nayWall Street and hedge funds wanted nay$13K$1K$34KNay · with industryNay · with industryNay · with industry
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 2022 · 217–213Gun lobby wanted nay$5KNay · with industry
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 2022 · 234–193Gun lobby wanted nay$5KNay · with industry
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 2022 · 232–193Pharma and health care wanted nay$1KNay · with industry
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 2021 · 227–203Gun lobby wanted nay$5KNay · with industry
PRO Act (union organizing)House · 2021 · 225–206Labor unions wanted yea$1KNay · against

Constituents vs. funders

Voted the way most of their constituents wanted on 0 of 5 key votes (0%)

On 1 vote, industries that gave them $10K+ before the vote wanted the opposite of what most of their constituents wanted. They sided with the funders 1 time and with their constituents 0. Constituent views come from the Cooperative Election Study, a survey of about 60,000 adults a year. A side counts as what constituents wanted only when it leads by more than the margin of error; closer results are shown as split. Party explains most votes, and none of this shows that money changed a vote.
Who sides with funders →
VoteTheir constituentsTheir fundersVoted
Lower Energy Costs ActHouse · 202349% support ±2California (statewide figure) · split · CES 2024 · related question$65K Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaYeaVoters split
Strategic Production Response ActHouse · 202349% support ±2California (statewide figure) · split · CES 2024 · related question$65K Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaYeaVoters split
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 202273% support ±2California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2022$13K Oil, gas and coal wanted nay$34K Wall Street and hedge funds wanted nayNayFunders over voters
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 202268% support ±2California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2022No industry with a side gave $10K+NayAgainst voters
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 202289% support ±2California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+NayAgainst voters
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 202287% support ±1California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2022 · related questionNo industry with a side gave $10K+NayAgainst voters
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 202194% support ±1California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+NayAgainst voters

The revolving door

1 former aide now lobbying

Lobbyists who list a job in Michelle Steel's office among the government positions they held, and who they now work for. A listed former position does not establish contact with that office.
  • Arie DanaFormer congressional staff

    Chief of Staff, Rep. Michelle Steel (2021-2025)

    Now lobbies for Republican Jewish Coalition

The revolving door, industry by industry →

Figures are the candidate's principal committees as filed with the FEC, cycle by cycle. See About the data.

Questions people ask

Who funded Michelle Steel's 2024 campaign?
Michelle Steel (Republican) raised $11M for the 2024 California 45th District race, $2.0M of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $5.2M for and $12M against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). They lost.
Which PACs gave the most to Michelle Steel?
Republican Jewish Coalition-Political Action Committee (Rjc-PAC) ($13K), Blue Shield of California PAC (Shield PAC) ($10K), Stop Collectivism Or Totalitarianism Triumphs PAC ($10K), Republican Governance Group/Tuesday Group PAC ($10K), Forever Youth Organization Utilizing a New Generation PAC ($10K) in 2024.
Which super PACs spent on Michelle Steel's race?
House Majority PAC ($6.4M against), DCCC ($3.0M against), Fairshake ($2.8M for) in 2024.
How much has Michelle Steel raised across elections?
$11M in 2024, $7.4M in 2022, $6.4M in 2020. Receipts are counted once per candidate and cycle.