← Who bought my rep

Politician

Jim Costa

Democrat · California · ran 4 times since 2020, won 4 · incumbent

FEC candidate H4CA20082

Jim Costa (Democrat) raised $1.7M for the 2026 California 21st District race, $980K of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $0 for and $0 against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). They won.

Raised, all cycles

$7.6M

2026, 2024, 2022, 2020; counted once per cycle

From PAC checks

57%

$4.3M from corporations, trade groups, unions and politicians

Outside money for

$32K

Super PACs and party groups helping

Outside money against

$0

Spent attacking them

57% of Jim Costa's campaign money came from PAC checks, not from people. That is one of the heaviest reliances on organized money in Congress.

Every run

Each election and its result. Campaign receipts cover the whole cycle and can appear in both regular and special contests; they count once in the totals above.
CycleRaceRaisedPAC shareOutside for / againstGoogle adsAll moneyResult
2026California 21st District$1.7M58%$0 / $0–$1.7M✓ Won
2024California 21st District$1.7M59%$0 / $0$7K$1.7M✓ Won
2022California 21st District$2.0M52%$32K / $0–$2.1M✓ Won
2020California 16th District$2.1M57%$0 / $0–$2.1M✓ Won

Who wrote the checks

The PACs that gave the most across every run, and what kind of money it is.

Outside money, for and against

Super PACs and party groups that spent the most on these races.
  • Valley Works Action Fundfor $32K

Funding and votes

How their votes align with industry funding

Across 26 industry-vote comparisons with at least $10K in traced funding, they voted the industry's way 9 times (35%). This is a retrospective comparison using covered 2020–2026 runs; some money arrived after the vote. A vote can appear for multiple industries. Unknown coverage is excluded. “With industry” means its stated preferred side, and does not establish causation.
All issues →
VoteIndustryTheir money from itVoted
NDAA FY2027House · 2026 · 216–212Defense contractors wanted yea$26KNay · against
Stop Insider Trading ActHouse · 2026 · 232–198Reported household trades wanted nayUnknown coverageNay · with industry
Faster Labor Contracts ActHouse · 2026 · 230–193Labor unions wanted yea$273KYea · with industry
Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection ActHouse · 2026 · 216–201Gun lobby wanted yea$2KNay · against
Year-round E15House · 2026 · 218–203Agriculture, food and retail wanted yeaOil, gas and coal wanted nay$593K$220KNay · againstNay · with industry
Farm, Food, and National Security ActHouse · 2026 · 224–200Agriculture, food and retail wanted yea$593KYea · with industry
Affordable HOMES ActHouse · 2026 · 263–147Real estate and construction wanted yea$101KYea · with industry
Protect America's Workforce ActHouse · 2025 · 231–195Labor unions wanted yea$273KYea · with industry
ANWR coastal plain leasingHouse · 2025 · 217–209Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$220KYea · with industry
NDAA FY2026House · 2025 · 231–196Defense contractors wanted yea$26KNay · against
GENIUS Act (stablecoins)House · 2025 · 308–122Crypto wanted yea$0Yea · with industry
CLARITY Act (crypto market structure)House · 2025 · 294–134Crypto wanted yea$0Yea · with industry
One Big Beautiful Bill ActHouse · 2025 · 218–214Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaWall Street and hedge funds wanted yea$220K$45KNay · againstNay · against
OCC bank merger rule repealHouse · 2025 · 220–207Wall Street and hedge funds wanted yea$45KNay · against
California clean cars waiver repealHouse · 2025 · 246–164Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$220KNay · against
CFPB overdraft rule repealHouse · 2025 · 217–211Wall Street and hedge funds wanted yea$45KNay · against
IRS DeFi broker rule repealHouse · 2025 · 292–132Crypto wanted yea$0Yea · with industry
Methane waste emissions charge repealHouse · 2025 · 220–206Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$220KNay · against
FIT21 (crypto market structure)House · 2024 · 279–136Crypto wanted yea$0Yea · with industry
Israel Security Assistance Support ActHouse · 2024 · 224–187Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$8KNay · against
SAB 121 repealHouse · 2024 · 228–182Crypto wanted yea$0Yea · with industry
Antisemitism Awareness ActHouse · 2024 · 320–91Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$8KYea · with industry
Israel security supplemental (Apr 2024)House · 2024 · 366–58Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$8KYea · with industry
Ukraine security supplementalHouse · 2024 · 311–112Defense contractors wanted yea$16KYea · with industry
Protecting Health Care for All Patients ActHouse · 2024 · 211–208Pharma and health care wanted yea$67KNay · against
Joint-employer rule repealHouse · 2024 · 206–177Labor unions wanted nay$188KYea · against
NDAA FY2024House · 2023 · 310–118Defense contractors wanted yea$16KYea · with industry
Israel aid (Nov 2023)House · 2023 · 226–196Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$8KNay · against
Pistol brace rule repealHouse · 2023 · 219–210Gun lobby wanted yea$2KNay · against
Lower Energy Costs ActHouse · 2023 · 225–204Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$149KNay · against
Strategic Production Response ActHouse · 2023 · 221–205Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$149KNay · against
Merger Filing Fee Modernization ActHouse · 2022 · 242–184Tech and AI wanted nay$10KYea · against
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 2022 · 220–207Oil, gas and coal wanted nayPharma and health care wanted nayWall Street and hedge funds wanted nay$74K$41K$12KYea · againstYea · againstYea · against
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 2022 · 217–213Gun lobby wanted nay$2KYea · against
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 2022 · 234–193Gun lobby wanted nay$2KYea · against
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 2022 · 232–193Pharma and health care wanted nay$41KYea · against
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 2021 · 227–203Gun lobby wanted nay$2KYea · against
PRO Act (union organizing)House · 2021 · 225–206Labor unions wanted yea$87KYea · with industry

Constituents vs. funders

Voted the way most of their constituents wanted on 5 of 5 key votes (100%)

On 2 votes, industries that gave them $10K+ before the vote wanted the opposite of what most of their constituents wanted. They sided with the funders 0 times and with their constituents 2. Constituent views come from the Cooperative Election Study, a survey of about 60,000 adults a year. A side counts as what constituents wanted only when it leads by more than the margin of error; closer results are shown as split. Party explains most votes, and none of this shows that money changed a vote.
Who sides with funders →
VoteTheir constituentsTheir fundersVoted
ANWR coastal plain leasingHouse · 202547% support ±16CA-21 · split · CES 2024 · related question$220K Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaYeaVoters split
One Big Beautiful Bill ActHouse · 202557% support ±16CA-21 · split · CES 2024 · related question$220K Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$45K Wall Street and hedge funds wanted yeaNayVoters split
Lower Energy Costs ActHouse · 202361% support ±15CA-21 · split · CES 2024 · related question$149K Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaNayVoters split
Strategic Production Response ActHouse · 202361% support ±15CA-21 · split · CES 2024 · related question$149K Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaNayVoters split
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 202273% support ±2California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2022$74K Oil, gas and coal wanted nay$41K Pharma and health care wanted nay$12K Wall Street and hedge funds wanted nayYeaVoters over funders
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 202268% support ±2California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2022No industry with a side gave $10K+YeaWith voters
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 202289% support ±2California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+YeaWith voters
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 202287% support ±1California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2022 · related question$41K Pharma and health care wanted nayYeaVoters over funders
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 202194% support ±1California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+YeaWith voters

The revolving door

3 former aides now lobbying

Lobbyists who list a job in Jim Costa's office among the government positions they held, and who they now work for. A listed former position does not establish contact with that office.
  • Donald GradyFormer congressional staff

    Legislative Assistant and Legislative Correspondent, Rep. Jim Costa; Legislative Correspondent and Staff Assistant, Rep. Jim Marshall.

    Now lobbies for United Egg Producers, International Dairy Foods Association

  • John DrakeFormer congressional staff

    Professional Staff, Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines and Hazardous Materials, U.S. House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, 2006-2009; Legis…

    Now lobbies for Chamber Of Commerce Of The U.S.A.

  • Claudia LarsonFormer congressional staff

    Strategic Policy Associate and Communication Director, Rep. Costa

    Now lobbies for National Milk Producers Federation

The revolving door, industry by industry →

Figures are the candidate's principal committees as filed with the FEC, cycle by cycle. See About the data.

Questions people ask

Who funded Jim Costa's 2026 campaign?
Jim Costa (Democrat) raised $1.7M for the 2026 California 21st District race, $980K of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $0 for and $0 against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). They won.
Which PACs gave the most to Jim Costa?
American Bankers Association PAC (Bankpac) ($10K), National Cattlemen's Beef Association Political Action Committee (Ncba-PAC) ($10K), The Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers Political Action Committee ($10K), National Propane Gas Association PAC ($10K), National Chicken Council Political Action Committee (Fka) National Broiler Council PAC ($10K) in 2026.
How much has Jim Costa raised across elections?
$1.7M in 2026, $1.7M in 2024, $2.0M in 2022, $2.1M in 2020. Receipts are counted once per candidate and cycle.