Politician
Dave Min
Democrat · California · ran 2 times since 2020, won 2 · incumbent
FEC candidate H4CA47085
Dave Min (Democrat) raised $3.9M for the 2026 California 47th District race, $673K of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $589K for and $0 against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). They won.
Raised, all cycles
$11M
2026, 2024; counted once per cycle
From PAC checks
13%
$1.3M from corporations, trade groups, unions and politicians
Outside money for
$3.6M
Super PACs and party groups helping
Outside money against
$3.8M
Spent attacking them
Every run
Each election and its result. Campaign receipts cover the whole cycle and can appear in both regular and special contests; they count once in the totals above.
| Cycle | Race | Raised | PAC share | Outside for / against | Google ads | All money | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | California 47th District | $3.9M | 17% | $589K / $0 | $147K | $4.5M | ✓ Won |
| 2024 | California 47th District | $6.8M | 10% | $3.0M / $3.8M | $998K | $14M | ✓ Won |
Who wrote the checks
The PACs that gave the most across every run, and what kind of money it is.
Union $351KLeadership PAC $292KOther $128KSuper PAC $95KMembership $86KTrade group $64KCorporate $28KParty $23K
- National Union of Healthcare Workers Federal Committee On Political EducationUnion$22K
- American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees P E O P L EUnionLobbyist PAC$20K
- American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO Committee On Political EducationUnion$15K
- Frontline USALeadership PAC$12K
- PAC to the FutureLeadership PAC$10K
- Ameripac: the Fund for a Greater AmericaLeadership PAC$10K
- American Association for Justice Political Action Committee (Aaj PAC)MembershipLobbyist PAC$10K
- Engineers Political Education Committee (Epec)/International Union of Operating EngineersUnionLobbyist PAC$10K
- Fair Shot PACLeadership PAC$10K
- Democratic Majority FundLeadership PAC$10K
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Political Action CommitteeUnionLobbyist PAC$10K
- Truth to PowerLeadership PAC$10K
Outside money, for and against
Super PACs and party groups that spent the most on these races.
- Club for Growth Actionagainst $2.1M
- Lcv Victory Fundfor $1.3M
- Win It Back PACagainst $1.2M
- House Majority PACfor $907K
- Everytown for Gun Safety Victory Fund (Everytown Victory Fund)for $560K
Funding and votes
How their votes align with industry funding
Across 8 industry-vote comparisons with at least $10K in traced funding, they voted the industry's way 2 times (25%). This is a retrospective comparison using covered 2020–2026 runs; some money arrived after the vote. A vote can appear for multiple industries. Unknown coverage is excluded. “With industry” means its stated preferred side, and does not establish causation.
| Vote | Industry | Their money from it | Voted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NDAA FY2027House · 2026 · 216–212 | Defense contractors wanted yea | $154 | Nay · against |
| Stop Insider Trading ActHouse · 2026 · 232–198 | Reported household trades wanted nay | $2K | Nay · with industry |
| Faster Labor Contracts ActHouse · 2026 · 230–193 | Labor unions wanted yea | $322K | Yea · with industry |
| Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection ActHouse · 2026 · 216–201 | Gun lobby wanted yea | $0 | Nay · against |
| Year-round E15House · 2026 · 218–203 | Agriculture, food and retail wanted yeaOil, gas and coal wanted nay | $14K$211 | Nay · againstNay · with industry |
| Farm, Food, and National Security ActHouse · 2026 · 224–200 | Agriculture, food and retail wanted yea | $14K | Nay · against |
| Affordable HOMES ActHouse · 2026 · 263–147 | Real estate and construction wanted yea | $33K | Nay · against |
| Protect America's Workforce ActHouse · 2025 · 231–195 | Labor unions wanted yea | $322K | Yea · with industry |
| ANWR coastal plain leasingHouse · 2025 · 217–209 | Oil, gas and coal wanted yea | $211 | Nay · against |
| NDAA FY2026House · 2025 · 231–196 | Defense contractors wanted yea | $154 | Nay · against |
| GENIUS Act (stablecoins)House · 2025 · 308–122 | Crypto wanted yea | $4K | Yea · with industry |
| CLARITY Act (crypto market structure)House · 2025 · 294–134 | Crypto wanted yea | $4K | Yea · with industry |
| One Big Beautiful Bill ActHouse · 2025 · 218–214 | Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaWall Street and hedge funds wanted yea | $211$91K | Nay · againstNay · against |
| OCC bank merger rule repealHouse · 2025 · 220–207 | Wall Street and hedge funds wanted yea | $91K | Nay · against |
| California clean cars waiver repealHouse · 2025 · 246–164 | Oil, gas and coal wanted yea | $211 | Nay · against |
| CFPB overdraft rule repealHouse · 2025 · 217–211 | Wall Street and hedge funds wanted yea | $91K | Nay · against |
| IRS DeFi broker rule repealHouse · 2025 · 292–132 | Crypto wanted yea | $4K | Nay · against |
| Methane waste emissions charge repealHouse · 2025 · 220–206 | Oil, gas and coal wanted yea | $211 | Nay · against |
Constituents vs. funders
Voted the way most of their constituents wanted on 0 of 1 key votes (0%)
None of these votes set their $10K+ industry funders against a clear majority of their constituents. Constituent views come from the Cooperative Election Study, a survey of about 60,000 adults a year. A side counts as what constituents wanted only when it leads by more than the margin of error; closer results are shown as split. Party explains most votes, and none of this shows that money changed a vote.
| Vote | Their constituents | Their funders | Voted |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANWR coastal plain leasingHouse · 2025 | 52% support ±2California (statewide figure) · split · CES 2024 · related question | No industry with a side gave $10K+ | NayVoters split |
| One Big Beautiful Bill ActHouse · 2025 | 58% support ±2California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024 · related question | $91K Wall Street and hedge funds wanted yea | NayAgainst voters |
Household disclosures
2 reported transactions, with volume $2K–$30K
Reconciled electronic STOCK Act reports from 1 filings since 2021, covering all reported asset types and transactions by a spouse or dependent child. 0 buys, 2 sells. Heaviest in tech and ai ($1K+).
Most traded
- FSLR First Solar, Inc. - Common Stock$1K+1 trades
- ZOOM Zoom Technologies, Inc.$1K+1 trades
Latest trades
- sellFSLR2025-03-19 · stock$1K–$15K
- sellZOOM2025-03-19 · stock$1K–$15K
Filings on the House Clerk's site.
Figures are the candidate's principal committees as filed with the FEC, cycle by cycle. See About the data.
Questions people ask
- Who funded Dave Min's 2026 campaign?
- Dave Min (Democrat) raised $3.9M for the 2026 California 47th District race, $673K of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $589K for and $0 against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). They won.
- Which PACs gave the most to Dave Min?
- PAC to the Future ($10K), Ameripac: the Fund for a Greater America ($10K), American Association for Justice Political Action Committee (Aaj PAC) ($10K), Engineers Political Education Committee (Epec)/International Union of Operating Engineers ($10K), Fair Shot PAC ($10K) in 2026.
- Which super PACs spent on Dave Min's race?
- Lcv Victory Fund ($589K for) in 2026.
- How much has Dave Min raised across elections?
- $3.9M in 2026, $6.8M in 2024. Receipts are counted once per candidate and cycle.