← Every product built on public research
Biogen · Nusinersen Sodium
Spinraza: patented from NIH-funded research, then Medicare paid $4.6M for it in 2025
$4.6M
Medicare paid, 2025
before rebates
$22M
Medicare, 2020–2025
$414K per patient in 2025
–
Medicare, 2026 Q1
the newest quarter CMS has published
$24M
NIH grants behind the patents
whole-grant totals, not the drug's cost
The public record, link by link
1 · Public research
4 NIH grants to Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, University of Massachusetts Med Sch Worcester, $24M in all.2 · Patent
7838657, 8361977, reported to NIH under R01GM042699, R01NS040275, R01NS041621, R37GM042699.3 · FDA approval
Approved Dec 23, 2016, sold by Biogen (NDA 209531).4 · Public pays
Medicare paid $4.6M in 2025 for 11 patients; Medicaid paid $113M in 2024.
What Medicare paid for Spinraza
The grants
Biochemistry of Pre-mRNA Splicing
R01GM042699 · Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory · NIGMS · 1989–2026
$12M
Biochemistry of Pre-mRNA Splicing
R37GM042699 · Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory · NIGMS · 2012–2021
$7.7M
Design of molecules that promote SMN2 exon 7 inclusion
R01NS041621 · Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory · NINDS · 2001–2005
$2.0M
MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIS OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY
R01NS040275 · University of Massachusetts Med Sch Worcester · NINDS · 2000–2004
$1.6M
The patents
- US 7838657FDA-listed expiry Jul 11, 2027
Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Treatment via Targeting of SMN2 Splice Site Inhibitory Sequences
Reported by University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
- US 8361977FDA-listed expiry Dec 23, 2030
Compositions and methods for modulations of SMN2 splicing
Reported by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Biogen's side
Drug makers pay for the clinical trials that take a compound from the lab to FDA approval, and they pay royalties on licensed patents. Those terms are not public. Separately, Biogen received $207K in federal contracts and grants since fiscal 2020, which includes purchases. Biogen's page shows its other products on this list, its federal awards, its PAC's giving and its lobbying. If Biogen wants to add its account, we will publish it here.
How this is built. A product is listed for one of two public records. Either NIH's Technology Transfer office lists it as an FDA-approved product built on a license from an NIH, CDC or FDA lab, or a patent the FDA lists for the drug was reported to NIH as an invention made with NIH grant money, as the Bayh-Dole Act requires. We then add what Medicare Part D, Part B and Medicaid paid for each product, and for each company, the federal grants and contracts it received, its PAC's donations and its lobbying.
What the numbers mean. Medicare and Medicaid figures are gross spending before the rebates drug makers pay back, which are confidential. Hospital-administered therapies such as CAR-T cell treatments are mostly paid under Medicare Part A and do not appear in these files. "NIH grants" is everything NIH paid on the grants a patent was reported under, from 1985 on; a grant usually paid for more than one invention, so it is not the cost of the drug. Federal contracts include purchases, such as vaccine doses, as well as research. Companies also paid for the clinical trials that took these products to approval. None of these figures shows that public money set a price or bought a decision.
Sources: NIH Technology Transfer: FDA-approved products licensed from NIH, CDC and FDA labs; NIH RePORTER patents reported under NIH grants (from iEdison); NIH RePORTER project funding; FDA Orange Book patent, exclusivity and product files; CMS Medicare Part D and Part B Spending by Drug (annual and quarterly); CMS Medicaid Spending by Drug; USAspending.gov federal grants and contracts. Updated 2026-11-06.