← Who bought my rep

Politician

Ron Kind

Democrat · Wisconsin · ran 1 time since 2020, won 1 · incumbent

FEC candidate H6WI03099

Ron Kind (Democrat) raised $3.0M for the 2020 Wisconsin 3rd District race, $2.0M of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $464K for and $1.6M against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). They won.

Raised, all cycles

$3.0M

2020; counted once per cycle

From PAC checks

67%

$2.0M from corporations, trade groups, unions and politicians

Outside money for

$464K

Super PACs and party groups helping

Outside money against

$1.6M

Spent attacking them

67% of Ron Kind's campaign money came from PAC checks, not from people. That is one of the heaviest reliances on organized money in Congress.

Every run

Each election and its result. Campaign receipts cover the whole cycle and can appear in both regular and special contests; they count once in the totals above.
CycleRaceRaisedPAC shareOutside for / againstGoogle adsAll moneyResult
2020Wisconsin 3rd District$3.0M67%$464K / $1.6M–$5.1M✓ Won

Who wrote the checks

The PACs that gave the most across every run, and what kind of money it is.
Corporate $927KTrade group $450KMembership $227KOther $163KLeadership PAC $88KUnion $85KSuper PAC $7KParty $32

Outside money, for and against

Super PACs and party groups that spent the most on these races.

Funding and votes

How their votes align with industry funding

Across 5 industry-vote comparisons with at least $10K in traced funding, they voted the industry's way 1 time (20%). This is a retrospective comparison using covered 2020–2026 runs; some money arrived after the vote. A vote can appear for multiple industries. Unknown coverage is excluded. “With industry” means its stated preferred side, and does not establish causation.
All issues →
VoteIndustryTheir money from itVoted
Merger Filing Fee Modernization ActHouse · 2022 · 242–184Tech and AI wanted nay$50KYea · against
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 2022 · 220–207Oil, gas and coal wanted nayPharma and health care wanted nayWall Street and hedge funds wanted nay$5K$349K$125KYea · againstYea · againstYea · against
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 2022 · 217–213Gun lobby wanted nay$2KNay · with industry
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 2022 · 234–193Gun lobby wanted nay$2KYea · against
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 2022 · 232–193Pharma and health care wanted nay$349KYea · against
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 2021 · 227–203Gun lobby wanted nay$2KYea · against
PRO Act (union organizing)House · 2021 · 225–206Labor unions wanted yea$109KYea · with industry

Constituents vs. funders

Voted the way most of their constituents wanted on 4 of 5 key votes (80%)

On 2 votes, industries that gave them $10K+ before the vote wanted the opposite of what most of their constituents wanted. They sided with the funders 0 times and with their constituents 2. Constituent views come from the Cooperative Election Study, a survey of about 60,000 adults a year. A side counts as what constituents wanted only when it leads by more than the margin of error; closer results are shown as split. Party explains most votes, and none of this shows that money changed a vote.
Who sides with funders →
VoteTheir constituentsTheir fundersVoted
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 202266% support ±10WI-03 · wanted Yea · CES 2022$349K Pharma and health care wanted nay$125K Wall Street and hedge funds wanted nayYeaVoters over funders
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 202261% support ±10WI-03 · wanted Yea · CES 2022No industry with a side gave $10K+NayAgainst voters
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 202283% support ±4Wisconsin (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+YeaWith voters
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 202285% support ±7WI-03 · wanted Yea · CES 2022 · related question$349K Pharma and health care wanted nayYeaVoters over funders
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 202189% support ±3Wisconsin (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+YeaWith voters

The revolving door

2 former aides now lobbying

Lobbyists who list a job in Ron Kind's office among the government positions they held, and who they now work for. A listed former position does not establish contact with that office.
  • Cynthia BrownFormer congressional staff

    Chief of Staff, Rep. Ron Kind (2003-2009); Legislative Director, Rep. Ron Kind (1999-2002)

    Now lobbies for T-Mobile, Amgen USA, INC., Verizon Communications INC And Various Subsidiaries, Eli Lilly And Company Fka Lilly USA, LLC and 8 more · via Forbes-Tate

  • Jack FryeFormer congressional staff

    Congressional Fellow, Rep. Ron Kind; Scheduler, Rep. Jamie Raskin

    Now lobbies for National Pork Producers Council

The revolving door, industry by industry →

Figures are the candidate's principal committees as filed with the FEC, cycle by cycle. See About the data.

Questions people ask

Who funded Ron Kind's 2020 campaign?
Ron Kind (Democrat) raised $3.0M for the 2020 Wisconsin 3rd District race, $2.0M of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $464K for and $1.6M against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). They won.
Which PACs gave the most to Ron Kind?
Deloitte Political Action Committee ($10K), American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. Federal PAC (Amfam PAC) ($10K), The Home Depot Inc. Political Action Committee ($10K), Investment Company Institute Political Action Committee (Ici PAC) ($10K), The Boeing Company Political Action Committee ($10K) in 2020.
Which super PACs spent on Ron Kind's race?
Congressional Leadership Fund ($1.6M against), American Hospital Association PAC ($300K for), Center Forward Committee ($155K for) in 2020.