← Who bought my rep

Politician

Rodney Davis

Republican · Illinois · ran 1 time since 2020, won 1 · incumbent

FEC candidate H2IL13120

Rodney Davis (Republican) raised $5.0M for the 2020 Illinois 13th District race, $2.9M of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $269K for and $6.5M against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). They won.

Raised, all cycles

$5.0M

2020; counted once per cycle

From PAC checks

57%

$2.9M from corporations, trade groups, unions and politicians

Outside money for

$269K

Super PACs and party groups helping

Outside money against

$6.5M

Spent attacking them

57% of Rodney Davis's campaign money came from PAC checks, not from people. That is one of the heaviest reliances on organized money in Congress.

Every run

Each election and its result. Campaign receipts cover the whole cycle and can appear in both regular and special contests; they count once in the totals above.
CycleRaceRaisedPAC shareOutside for / againstGoogle adsAll moneyResult
2020Illinois 13th District$5.0M57%$269K / $6.5M$2K$12M✓ Won

Who wrote the checks

The PACs that gave the most across every run, and what kind of money it is.

Outside money, for and against

Super PACs and party groups that spent the most on these races.

Funding and votes

How their votes align with industry funding

Across 6 industry-vote comparisons with at least $10K in traced funding, they voted the industry's way 5 times (83%). This is a retrospective comparison using covered 2020–2026 runs; some money arrived after the vote. A vote can appear for multiple industries. Unknown coverage is excluded. “With industry” means its stated preferred side, and does not establish causation.
All issues →
VoteIndustryTheir money from itVoted
Merger Filing Fee Modernization ActHouse · 2022 · 242–184Tech and AI wanted nay$36KNay · with industry
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 2022 · 220–207Oil, gas and coal wanted nayPharma and health care wanted nayWall Street and hedge funds wanted nay$79K$161K$128KNay · with industryNay · with industryNay · with industry
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 2022 · 217–213Gun lobby wanted nay$4KNay · with industry
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 2022 · 234–193Gun lobby wanted nay$4KNay · with industry
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 2022 · 232–193Pharma and health care wanted nay$161KNay · with industry
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 2021 · 227–203Gun lobby wanted nay$4KNay · with industry
PRO Act (union organizing)House · 2021 · 225–206Labor unions wanted yea$227KNay · against

Constituents vs. funders

Voted the way most of their constituents wanted on 0 of 5 key votes (0%)

On 2 votes, industries that gave them $10K+ before the vote wanted the opposite of what most of their constituents wanted. They sided with the funders 2 times and with their constituents 0. Constituent views come from the Cooperative Election Study, a survey of about 60,000 adults a year. A side counts as what constituents wanted only when it leads by more than the margin of error; closer results are shown as split. Party explains most votes, and none of this shows that money changed a vote.
Who sides with funders →
VoteTheir constituentsTheir fundersVoted
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 202280% support ±12IL-13 · wanted Yea · CES 2022$79K Oil, gas and coal wanted nay$161K Pharma and health care wanted nay$128K Wall Street and hedge funds wanted nayNayFunders over voters
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 202272% support ±13IL-13 · wanted Yea · CES 2022No industry with a side gave $10K+NayAgainst voters
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 202290% support ±2Illinois (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+NayAgainst voters
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 202292% support ±8IL-13 · wanted Yea · CES 2022 · related question$161K Pharma and health care wanted nayNayFunders over voters
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 202195% support ±2Illinois (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+NayAgainst voters

The revolving door

3 former aides now lobbying

Lobbyists who list a job in Rodney Davis's office among the government positions they held, and who they now work for. A listed former position does not establish contact with that office.
  • Jennifer DaulbyFormer congressional staff

    Staff Director, House Administration Committee, Asst to Rep. Rodney Davis; Chief of Staff, Rep. Rodney Davis; Legislative Counsel, Rep. Steve Chabot; Associa…

    Now lobbies for Pfizer INC, Cme Group, INC., Verizon Communications INC And Various Subsidiaries, American Petroleum Institute · via Ogr

  • Bret ManleyFormer congressional staff

    Chief of Staff, Rep. Rodney Davis 19-22; Chief of Staff, Rep. Jeff Denham 17-18; Legislative Director, Rep. Jeff Denham 11-17; Financial Services Policy Advi…

    Now lobbies for Microsoft Corporation, General Electric Company · via Elevate Government Affairs, LLC

  • Ricardo BernalFormer congressional staff

    Congressman Rodney Davis, Senior Advisor; Congressman Stevan Pearce, Press Secretary/Senior Legislative Assistant

    Now lobbies for Westinghouse Electric Company

The revolving door, industry by industry →

Figures are the candidate's principal committees as filed with the FEC, cycle by cycle. See About the data.

Questions people ask

Who funded Rodney Davis's 2020 campaign?
Rodney Davis (Republican) raised $5.0M for the 2020 Illinois 13th District race, $2.9M of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $269K for and $6.5M against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). They won.
Which PACs gave the most to Rodney Davis?
Votesane PAC ($13K), The Williams Companies, Inc. Political Action Committee ($10K), The Home Depot Inc. Political Action Committee ($10K), International Franchise Association Franchising Political Action Committee Inc ($10K), United Mine Workers of America - Coal Miners Political Action Committee ($10K) in 2020.
Which super PACs spent on Rodney Davis's race?
House Majority PAC ($3.4M against), DCCC ($2.7M against), Women Vote! ($254K against) in 2020.