Politician
Marlin Stutzman
Republican · Indiana · ran 1 time since 2020, won 1
FEC candidate H0IN03198
Marlin Stutzman (Republican) raised $967K for the 2026 Indiana 3rd District race, $442K of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $0 for and $0 against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). They won.
Raised, all cycles
$967K
2026; counted once per cycle
From PAC checks
46%
$442K from corporations, trade groups, unions and politicians
Outside money for
$0
Super PACs and party groups helping
Outside money against
$0
Spent attacking them
Every run
Each election and its result. Campaign receipts cover the whole cycle and can appear in both regular and special contests; they count once in the totals above.
| Cycle | Race | Raised | PAC share | Outside for / against | Google ads | All money | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Indiana 3rd District | $967K | 46% | $0 / $0 | – | $967K | ✓ Won |
Who wrote the checks
The PACs that gave the most across every run, and what kind of money it is.
Trade group $37KCorporate $33KLeadership PAC $19KMembership $9KOther $8K
- National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors Political Action CommTrade groupLobbyist PAC$10K
- Buckeye Liberty Political Action CommitteeLeadership PAC$10K
- America's Bold Era PACLeadership PAC$5K
- Ubs Americas Inc. Political Action Committee (Ubs PAC)CorporateLobbyist PAC$5K
- Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. Political Action Committee (Abc PAC)Trade groupLobbyist PAC$5K
- Pricewaterhousecoopers Political Action Committee ICorporateLobbyist PAC$4K
- Kpmg Partners/Principals and Employees PACOtherLobbyist PAC$4K
- Making America Restore Leadership & Independence Now Political Action CommitteeLeadership PAC$4K
Outside money, for and against
Super PACs and party groups that spent the most on these races.
No outside spending of note.
Funding and votes
How their votes align with industry funding
No covered comparison reached $10K in traced industry funding. This is a retrospective comparison using covered 2020–2026 runs; some money arrived after the vote. A vote can appear for multiple industries. Unknown coverage is excluded. “With industry” means its stated preferred side, and does not establish causation.
| Vote | Industry | Their money from it | Voted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NDAA FY2027House · 2026 · 216–212 | Defense contractors wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Yea · with industry |
| Stop Insider Trading ActHouse · 2026 · 232–198 | Reported household trades wanted nay | Unknown coverage | Yea · against |
| Faster Labor Contracts ActHouse · 2026 · 230–193 | Labor unions wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Nay · against |
| Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection ActHouse · 2026 · 216–201 | Gun lobby wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Yea · with industry |
| Year-round E15House · 2026 · 218–203 | Agriculture, food and retail wanted yeaOil, gas and coal wanted nay | Unknown coverageUnknown coverage | Yea · with industryYea · against |
| Farm, Food, and National Security ActHouse · 2026 · 224–200 | Agriculture, food and retail wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Yea · with industry |
| Affordable HOMES ActHouse · 2026 · 263–147 | Real estate and construction wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Yea · with industry |
| Protect America's Workforce ActHouse · 2025 · 231–195 | Labor unions wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Nay · against |
| ANWR coastal plain leasingHouse · 2025 · 217–209 | Oil, gas and coal wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Yea · with industry |
| NDAA FY2026House · 2025 · 231–196 | Defense contractors wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Yea · with industry |
| GENIUS Act (stablecoins)House · 2025 · 308–122 | Crypto wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Yea · with industry |
| CLARITY Act (crypto market structure)House · 2025 · 294–134 | Crypto wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Yea · with industry |
| One Big Beautiful Bill ActHouse · 2025 · 218–214 | Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaWall Street and hedge funds wanted yea | Unknown coverageUnknown coverage | Yea · with industryYea · with industry |
| OCC bank merger rule repealHouse · 2025 · 220–207 | Wall Street and hedge funds wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Yea · with industry |
| California clean cars waiver repealHouse · 2025 · 246–164 | Oil, gas and coal wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Yea · with industry |
| CFPB overdraft rule repealHouse · 2025 · 217–211 | Wall Street and hedge funds wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Yea · with industry |
| IRS DeFi broker rule repealHouse · 2025 · 292–132 | Crypto wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Yea · with industry |
| Methane waste emissions charge repealHouse · 2025 · 220–206 | Oil, gas and coal wanted yea | Unknown coverage | Yea · with industry |
Constituents vs. funders
Voted the way most of their constituents wanted on 1 of 1 key votes (100%)
None of these votes set their $10K+ industry funders against a clear majority of their constituents. Constituent views come from the Cooperative Election Study, a survey of about 60,000 adults a year. A side counts as what constituents wanted only when it leads by more than the margin of error; closer results are shown as split. Party explains most votes, and none of this shows that money changed a vote.
| Vote | Their constituents | Their funders | Voted |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANWR coastal plain leasingHouse · 2025 | 36% support ±14IN-03 · wanted Yea · CES 2024 · related question | No industry with a side gave $10K+ | YeaWith voters |
| One Big Beautiful Bill ActHouse · 2025 | 59% support ±14IN-03 · split · CES 2024 · related question | No industry with a side gave $10K+ | YeaVoters split |
The revolving door
1 former aide now lobbying
Lobbyists who list a job in Marlin Stutzman's office among the government positions they held, and who they now work for. A listed former position does not establish contact with that office.
Michael KelleyFormer congressional staff
Acting Assistant Secretary for Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; Deputy Chief of Staff & Legis…
Now lobbies for Bipartisan Policy Center Action
Figures are the candidate's principal committees as filed with the FEC, cycle by cycle. See About the data.
Questions people ask
- Who funded Marlin Stutzman's 2026 campaign?
- Marlin Stutzman (Republican) raised $967K for the 2026 Indiana 3rd District race, $442K of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $0 for and $0 against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). They won.
- Which PACs gave the most to Marlin Stutzman?
- National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors Political Action Comm ($10K), Buckeye Liberty Political Action Committee ($10K), America's Bold Era PAC ($5K), Ubs Americas Inc. Political Action Committee (Ubs PAC) ($5K), Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. Political Action Committee (Abc PAC) ($5K) in 2026.