← Who bought my rep

Politician

Jaime Herrera Beutler

Republican · Washington · ran 1 time since 2020, won 1 · incumbent

FEC candidate H0WA03187

Jaime Herrera Beutler (Republican) raised $4.6M for the 2020 Washington 3rd District race, $1.5M of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $294K for and $1.0M against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). They won.

Raised, all cycles

$4.6M

2020; counted once per cycle

From PAC checks

32%

$1.5M from corporations, trade groups, unions and politicians

Outside money for

$294K

Super PACs and party groups helping

Outside money against

$1.0M

Spent attacking them

Every run

Each election and its result. Campaign receipts cover the whole cycle and can appear in both regular and special contests; they count once in the totals above.
CycleRaceRaisedPAC shareOutside for / againstGoogle adsAll moneyResult
2020Washington 3rd District$4.6M32%$294K / $1.0M–$5.9M✓ Won

Who wrote the checks

The PACs that gave the most across every run, and what kind of money it is.
Corporate $497KLeadership PAC $289KTrade group $244KOther $132KMembership $116KUnion $37KSuper PAC $34K

Outside money, for and against

Super PACs and party groups that spent the most on these races.

Funding and votes

How their votes align with industry funding

Across 6 industry-vote comparisons with at least $10K in traced funding, they voted the industry's way 4 times (67%). This is a retrospective comparison using covered 2020–2026 runs; some money arrived after the vote. A vote can appear for multiple industries. Unknown coverage is excluded. “With industry” means its stated preferred side, and does not establish causation.
All issues →
VoteIndustryTheir money from itVoted
Merger Filing Fee Modernization ActHouse · 2022 · 242–184Tech and AI wanted nay$41KNay · with industry
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 2022 · 220–207Oil, gas and coal wanted nayPharma and health care wanted nayWall Street and hedge funds wanted nay$31K$108K$67KNay · with industryNay · with industryNay · with industry
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 2022 · 217–213Gun lobby wanted nay$3KNay · with industry
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 2022 · 234–193Gun lobby wanted nay$3KNay · with industry
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 2022 · 232–193Pharma and health care wanted nay$108KYea · against
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 2021 · 227–203Gun lobby wanted nay$3KNay · with industry
PRO Act (union organizing)House · 2021 · 225–206Labor unions wanted yea$52KNay · against

Constituents vs. funders

Voted the way most of their constituents wanted on 1 of 4 key votes (25%)

On 2 votes, industries that gave them $10K+ before the vote wanted the opposite of what most of their constituents wanted. They sided with the funders 1 time and with their constituents 1. Constituent views come from the Cooperative Election Study, a survey of about 60,000 adults a year. A side counts as what constituents wanted only when it leads by more than the margin of error; closer results are shown as split. Party explains most votes, and none of this shows that money changed a vote.
Who sides with funders →
VoteTheir constituentsTheir fundersVoted
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 202267% support ±9WA-03 · wanted Yea · CES 2022$31K Oil, gas and coal wanted nay$108K Pharma and health care wanted nay$67K Wall Street and hedge funds wanted nayNayFunders over voters
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 202251% support ±9WA-03 · split · CES 2022No industry with a side gave $10K+NayVoters split
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 202286% support ±3Washington (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+NayAgainst voters
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 202285% support ±7WA-03 · wanted Yea · CES 2022 · related question$108K Pharma and health care wanted nayYeaVoters over funders
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 202194% support ±2Washington (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+NayAgainst voters

The revolving door

1 former aide now lobbying

Lobbyists who list a job in Jaime Herrera Beutler's office among the government positions they held, and who they now work for. A listed former position does not establish contact with that office.
  • Daniel SadloskyFormer congressional staff

    Policy Advisor, House Republican Whip (9/2/14-8/8/21); Leg. Assist., Rep. Herrera-Beutler (1/30/13-9/1/14); Leg. Assist. Rep Hayworth (1/3/11-1/2/13); Leg. A…

    Now lobbies for RTX Corporation And Affiliates

The revolving door, industry by industry →

Figures are the candidate's principal committees as filed with the FEC, cycle by cycle. See About the data.

Questions people ask

Who funded Jaime Herrera Beutler's 2020 campaign?
Jaime Herrera Beutler (Republican) raised $4.6M for the 2020 Washington 3rd District race, $1.5M of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $294K for and $1.0M against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). They won.
Which PACs gave the most to Jaime Herrera Beutler?
Winred ($20K), National Association of Letter Carriers of U.S.a. Political Fund (Letter Carrier Political Fund) ($12K), Winning for Women, Inc. PAC ($11K), Cmr Political Action Committee ($11K), Investment Company Institute Political Action Committee (Ici PAC) ($10K) in 2020.
Which super PACs spent on Jaime Herrera Beutler's race?
DCCC ($892K against), American College of Ob-Gyns PAC (Ob-Gyn PAC) ($116K for), Defending Main Street Superpac Inc. ($108K for) in 2020.