← Who bought my rep

Politician

Grace F. Napolitano

Democrat · California · ran 2 times since 2020, won 2 · incumbent

FEC candidate H8CA34068

Grace F. Napolitano (Democrat) raised $367K for the 2022 California 31st District race, $287K of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $0 for and $0 against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). They won.

Raised, all cycles

$851K

2022, 2020; counted once per cycle

From PAC checks

78%

$661K from corporations, trade groups, unions and politicians

Outside money for

$14

Super PACs and party groups helping

Outside money against

$0

Spent attacking them

Every run

Each election and its result. Campaign receipts cover the whole cycle and can appear in both regular and special contests; they count once in the totals above.
CycleRaceRaisedPAC shareOutside for / againstGoogle adsAll moneyResult
2022California 31st District$367K78%$0 / $0–$367K✓ Won
2020California 32nd District$483K77%$14 / $0–$483K✓ Won

Who wrote the checks

The PACs that gave the most across every run, and what kind of money it is.

Outside money, for and against

Super PACs and party groups that spent the most on these races.
  • National Union of Healthcare Workers Federal Committee On Political Educationfor $14

Funding and votes

How their votes align with industry funding

Across 7 industry-vote comparisons with at least $10K in traced funding, they voted the industry's way 4 times (57%). This is a retrospective comparison using covered 2020–2026 runs; some money arrived after the vote. A vote can appear for multiple industries. Unknown coverage is excluded. “With industry” means its stated preferred side, and does not establish causation.
All issues →
VoteIndustryTheir money from itVoted
FIT21 (crypto market structure)House · 2024 · 279–136Crypto wanted yea$0Nay · against
Israel Security Assistance Support ActHouse · 2024 · 224–187Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$8KNay · against
SAB 121 repealHouse · 2024 · 228–182Crypto wanted yea$0Nay · against
Antisemitism Awareness ActHouse · 2024 · 320–91Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$8KYea · with industry
Israel security supplemental (Apr 2024)House · 2024 · 366–58Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$8KYea · with industry
Ukraine security supplementalHouse · 2024 · 311–112Defense contractors wanted yea$16KYea · with industry
Protecting Health Care for All Patients ActHouse · 2024 · 211–208Pharma and health care wanted yea$24KNay · against
Joint-employer rule repealHouse · 2024 · 206–177Labor unions wanted nay$251KNay · with industry
NDAA FY2024House · 2023 · 310–118Defense contractors wanted yea$16KYea · with industry
Israel aid (Nov 2023)House · 2023 · 226–196Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$8KPresent / not voting
Pistol brace rule repealHouse · 2023 · 219–210Gun lobby wanted yea$0Nay · against
Lower Energy Costs ActHouse · 2023 · 225–204Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$4KNay · against
Strategic Production Response ActHouse · 2023 · 221–205Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$4KNay · against
Merger Filing Fee Modernization ActHouse · 2022 · 242–184Tech and AI wanted nay$8KYea · against
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 2022 · 220–207Oil, gas and coal wanted nayPharma and health care wanted nayWall Street and hedge funds wanted nay$2K$11K$0Yea · againstYea · againstYea · against
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 2022 · 217–213Gun lobby wanted nay$0Yea · against
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 2022 · 234–193Gun lobby wanted nay$0Yea · against
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 2022 · 232–193Pharma and health care wanted nay$11KYea · against
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 2021 · 227–203Gun lobby wanted nay$0Yea · against
PRO Act (union organizing)House · 2021 · 225–206Labor unions wanted yea$147KYea · with industry

Constituents vs. funders

Voted the way most of their constituents wanted on 5 of 5 key votes (100%)

On 2 votes, industries that gave them $10K+ before the vote wanted the opposite of what most of their constituents wanted. They sided with the funders 0 times and with their constituents 2. Constituent views come from the Cooperative Election Study, a survey of about 60,000 adults a year. A side counts as what constituents wanted only when it leads by more than the margin of error; closer results are shown as split. Party explains most votes, and none of this shows that money changed a vote.
Who sides with funders →
VoteTheir constituentsTheir fundersVoted
Lower Energy Costs ActHouse · 202349% support ±2California (statewide figure) · split · CES 2024 · related questionNo industry with a side gave $10K+NayVoters split
Strategic Production Response ActHouse · 202349% support ±2California (statewide figure) · split · CES 2024 · related questionNo industry with a side gave $10K+NayVoters split
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 202273% support ±2California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2022$11K Pharma and health care wanted nayYeaVoters over funders
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 202268% support ±2California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2022No industry with a side gave $10K+YeaWith voters
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 202289% support ±2California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+YeaWith voters
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 202287% support ±1California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2022 · related question$11K Pharma and health care wanted nayYeaVoters over funders
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 202194% support ±1California (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+YeaWith voters

The revolving door

1 former aide now lobbying

Lobbyists who list a job in Grace F. Napolitano's office among the government positions they held, and who they now work for. A listed former position does not establish contact with that office.
  • Adriana RiveraFormer congressional staff

    Military Legislative Assistant & Military Legislative Aide - U.S. Senate (Sen. Bennet) Staff Assistant, Legislative Correspondent, Legislative Aide, and Legi…

    Now lobbies for Persistent Systems, LLC, Association For Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International

The revolving door, industry by industry →

Figures are the candidate's principal committees as filed with the FEC, cycle by cycle. See About the data.

Questions people ask

Who funded Grace F. Napolitano's 2022 campaign?
Grace F. Napolitano (Democrat) raised $367K for the 2022 California 31st District race, $287K of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $0 for and $0 against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). They won.
Which PACs gave the most to Grace F. Napolitano?
American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees P E O P L E ($10K), National Union of Healthcare Workers Federal Committee On Political Education ($10K), Carpenters Legislative Improvement Committee United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners ($10K), American Crystal Sugar Company Political Action Committee ($10K), American Council of Engineering Companies (Acec/PAC) ($8K) in 2022.
How much has Grace F. Napolitano raised across elections?
$367K in 2022, $483K in 2020. Receipts are counted once per candidate and cycle.