← Who bought my rep

Politician

Debbie Dingell

Democrat · Michigan · ran 4 times since 2020, won 4 · incumbent

FEC candidate H4MI12079

Debbie Dingell (Democrat) raised $1.5M for the 2026 Michigan 6th District race, $910K of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $2K for and $0 against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). They won.

Raised, all cycles

$6.3M

2026, 2024, 2022, 2020; counted once per cycle

From PAC checks

58%

$3.6M from corporations, trade groups, unions and politicians

Outside money for

$9K

Super PACs and party groups helping

Outside money against

$0

Spent attacking them

58% of Debbie Dingell's campaign money came from PAC checks, not from people. That is one of the heaviest reliances on organized money in Congress.

Every run

Each election and its result. Campaign receipts cover the whole cycle and can appear in both regular and special contests; they count once in the totals above.
CycleRaceRaisedPAC shareOutside for / againstGoogle adsAll moneyResult
2026Michigan 6th District$1.5M60%$2K / $0$400$1.5M✓ Won
2024Michigan 6th District$1.6M62%$1K / $0–$1.6M✓ Won
2022Michigan 6th District$1.6M52%$5K / $0–$1.6M✓ Won
2020Michigan 12th District$1.6M58%$500 / $0–$1.6M✓ Won

Who wrote the checks

The PACs that gave the most across every run, and what kind of money it is.
Corporate $1.5MTrade group $710KUnion $663KMembership $402KOther $223KSuper PAC $40KLeadership PAC $5K

Outside money, for and against

Super PACs and party groups that spent the most on these races.
  • Supermajority PACfor $5K
  • United We Canfor $2K
  • Arab American Political Action Committeefor $1K
  • Aft Solidarityfor $500

Funding and votes

How their votes align with industry funding

Across 26 industry-vote comparisons with at least $10K in traced funding, they voted the industry's way 6 times (23%). This is a retrospective comparison using covered 2020–2026 runs; some money arrived after the vote. A vote can appear for multiple industries. Unknown coverage is excluded. “With industry” means its stated preferred side, and does not establish causation.
All issues →
VoteIndustryTheir money from itVoted
NDAA FY2027House · 2026 · 216–212Defense contractors wanted yea$42KNay · against
Stop Insider Trading ActHouse · 2026 · 232–198Reported household trades wanted nay$933KNay · with industry
Faster Labor Contracts ActHouse · 2026 · 230–193Labor unions wanted yea$545KYea · with industry
Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection ActHouse · 2026 · 216–201Gun lobby wanted yea$0Nay · against
Year-round E15House · 2026 · 218–203Agriculture, food and retail wanted yeaOil, gas and coal wanted nay$232K$40KNay · againstNay · with industry
Farm, Food, and National Security ActHouse · 2026 · 224–200Agriculture, food and retail wanted yea$232KNay · against
Affordable HOMES ActHouse · 2026 · 263–147Real estate and construction wanted yea$39KNay · against
Protect America's Workforce ActHouse · 2025 · 231–195Labor unions wanted yea$545KYea · with industry
ANWR coastal plain leasingHouse · 2025 · 217–209Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$40KNay · against
NDAA FY2026House · 2025 · 231–196Defense contractors wanted yea$42KNay · against
GENIUS Act (stablecoins)House · 2025 · 308–122Crypto wanted yea$0Nay · against
CLARITY Act (crypto market structure)House · 2025 · 294–134Crypto wanted yea$0Nay · against
One Big Beautiful Bill ActHouse · 2025 · 218–214Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaWall Street and hedge funds wanted yea$40K$64KNay · againstNay · against
OCC bank merger rule repealHouse · 2025 · 220–207Wall Street and hedge funds wanted yea$64KNay · against
California clean cars waiver repealHouse · 2025 · 246–164Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$40KNay · against
CFPB overdraft rule repealHouse · 2025 · 217–211Wall Street and hedge funds wanted yea$64KNay · against
IRS DeFi broker rule repealHouse · 2025 · 292–132Crypto wanted yea$0Nay · against
Methane waste emissions charge repealHouse · 2025 · 220–206Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$40KNay · against
FIT21 (crypto market structure)House · 2024 · 279–136Crypto wanted yea$0Nay · against
Israel Security Assistance Support ActHouse · 2024 · 224–187Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$8KNay · against
SAB 121 repealHouse · 2024 · 228–182Crypto wanted yea$0Nay · against
Antisemitism Awareness ActHouse · 2024 · 320–91Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$8KYea · with industry
Israel security supplemental (Apr 2024)House · 2024 · 366–58Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$8KPresent / not voting
Ukraine security supplementalHouse · 2024 · 311–112Defense contractors wanted yea$23KPresent / not voting
Protecting Health Care for All Patients ActHouse · 2024 · 211–208Pharma and health care wanted yea$209KNay · against
Joint-employer rule repealHouse · 2024 · 206–177Labor unions wanted nay$347KNay · with industry
NDAA FY2024House · 2023 · 310–118Defense contractors wanted yea$23KYea · with industry
Israel aid (Nov 2023)House · 2023 · 226–196Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$8KNay · against
Pistol brace rule repealHouse · 2023 · 219–210Gun lobby wanted yea$0Nay · against
Lower Energy Costs ActHouse · 2023 · 225–204Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$28KNay · against
Strategic Production Response ActHouse · 2023 · 221–205Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$28KNay · against
Merger Filing Fee Modernization ActHouse · 2022 · 242–184Tech and AI wanted nay$17KYea · against
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 2022 · 220–207Oil, gas and coal wanted nayPharma and health care wanted nayWall Street and hedge funds wanted nay$15K$123K$19KYea · againstYea · againstYea · against
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 2022 · 217–213Gun lobby wanted nay$0Yea · against
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 2022 · 234–193Gun lobby wanted nay$0Yea · against
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 2022 · 232–193Pharma and health care wanted nay$123KYea · against
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 2021 · 227–203Gun lobby wanted nay$0Yea · against
PRO Act (union organizing)House · 2021 · 225–206Labor unions wanted yea$177KYea · with industry

Constituents vs. funders

Voted the way most of their constituents wanted on 7 of 7 key votes (100%)

On 4 votes, industries that gave them $10K+ before the vote wanted the opposite of what most of their constituents wanted. They sided with the funders 0 times and with their constituents 4. Constituent views come from the Cooperative Election Study, a survey of about 60,000 adults a year. A side counts as what constituents wanted only when it leads by more than the margin of error; closer results are shown as split. Party explains most votes, and none of this shows that money changed a vote.
Who sides with funders →
VoteTheir constituentsTheir fundersVoted
ANWR coastal plain leasingHouse · 202563% support ±16MI-06 · split · CES 2024 · related question$40K Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaNayVoters split
One Big Beautiful Bill ActHouse · 202553% support ±16MI-06 · split · CES 2024 · related question$40K Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$64K Wall Street and hedge funds wanted yeaNayVoters split
Lower Energy Costs ActHouse · 202331% support ±15MI-06 · wanted Nay · CES 2024 · related question$28K Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaNayVoters over funders
Strategic Production Response ActHouse · 202331% support ±15MI-06 · wanted Nay · CES 2024 · related question$28K Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaNayVoters over funders
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 202278% support ±10MI-12 · wanted Yea · CES 2022$15K Oil, gas and coal wanted nay$123K Pharma and health care wanted nay$19K Wall Street and hedge funds wanted nayYeaVoters over funders
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 202270% support ±11MI-12 · wanted Yea · CES 2022No industry with a side gave $10K+YeaWith voters
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 202285% support ±3Michigan (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+YeaWith voters
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 202292% support ±7MI-12 · wanted Yea · CES 2022 · related question$123K Pharma and health care wanted nayYeaVoters over funders
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 202194% support ±2Michigan (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+YeaWith voters

Household disclosures

57 reported transactions, with volume $933K–$2.8M

Reconciled electronic STOCK Act reports from 34 filings since 2021, covering all reported asset types and transactions by a spouse or dependent child. 22 buys, 25 sells. Heaviest in tech and ai ($141K+), wall street and hedge funds ($76K+), defense contractors ($65K+).
All traders →

Most traded

  • AAPL Apple Inc. - Common Stock$111K+6 trades
  • HONAV Honeywell Aerospace Inc. - Common Stock$65K+2 trades
  • ABBV AbbVie Inc.$50K+1 trades
  • BX Blackstone Inc.$30K+2 trades
  • DIS Walt Disney Company$17K+3 trades
  • VIAC ViacomCBS Inc. - Class B$16K+2 trades
  • GOOG Alphabet Inc. - Class C Capital Stock$15K+1 trades
  • HON Honeywell International Inc.$15K+1 trades

Latest trades

  • buyFHLMC 30 YR GOLD RQ01282026-07-14 · government bond$15K–$50K
  • exchangeHONAV2026-06-29 · stock$50K–$100K
  • exchangeHONAV2026-06-29 · stock$15K–$50K
  • buyFEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION PO2026-05-26 · corporate bond$50K–$100K
  • buyPTA2026-04-21 · stock$1K–$15K
  • buyMICHIGAN ST HSG DEV AUTH SINGLE FAMILY M2026-04-21 · government bond · joint$15K–$50K
  • exchangeWAT2026-02-10 · stock$1K–$15K
  • exchangeVSNT2026-01-05 · other$1K–$15K

Filings on the House Clerk's site.

The revolving door

1 former aide now lobbying

Lobbyists who list a job in Debbie Dingell's office among the government positions they held, and who they now work for. A listed former position does not establish contact with that office.
  • Gregory SunstrumFormer congressional staff

    Chief of Staff , Rep. Debbie Dingell; Deputy Chief of Staff and Leg. Director, Rep. Debbie Dingell ; Leg. Director, Rep. John Dingell; Leg. Assistant, Rep. J…

    Now lobbies for Eli Lilly And Company, Credit Union National Association, INC. Dba Americas Credit Unions, Novartis, National Multifamily Housing Council and 3 more · via Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP

The revolving door, industry by industry →

Figures are the candidate's principal committees as filed with the FEC, cycle by cycle. See About the data.

Questions people ask

Who funded Debbie Dingell's 2026 campaign?
Debbie Dingell (Democrat) raised $1.5M for the 2026 Michigan 6th District race, $910K of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $2K for and $0 against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). They won.
Which PACs gave the most to Debbie Dingell?
Cms Energy Corporation Employees for Better Government- Federal ($10K), National Automobile Dealers Association Political Action Committee ($10K), D.R.I.V.E. - Dem, Rep, Ind Voter Ed (the PAC of the Int'l Brhd of Teamsters) ($10K), International Association of Firefighters Interested in Registration and Education PAC ($10K), Dte Energy Company Political Action Committee ($10K) in 2026.
Which super PACs spent on Debbie Dingell's race?
United We Can ($2K for) in 2026.
How much has Debbie Dingell raised across elections?
$1.5M in 2026, $1.6M in 2024, $1.6M in 2022, $1.6M in 2020. Receipts are counted once per candidate and cycle.