← Who bought my rep

Politician

Blaine Luetkemeyer

Republican · Missouri · ran 2 times since 2020, won 2 · incumbent

FEC candidate H8MO09153

Blaine Luetkemeyer (Republican) raised $3.6M for the 2022 Missouri 3rd District race, $1.4M of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $0 for and $0 against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). They won.

Raised, all cycles

$5.7M

2022, 2020; counted once per cycle

From PAC checks

53%

$3.0M from corporations, trade groups, unions and politicians

Outside money for

$0

Super PACs and party groups helping

Outside money against

$0

Spent attacking them

53% of Blaine Luetkemeyer's campaign money came from PAC checks, not from people. That is one of the heaviest reliances on organized money in Congress.

Every run

Each election and its result. Campaign receipts cover the whole cycle and can appear in both regular and special contests; they count once in the totals above.
CycleRaceRaisedPAC shareOutside for / againstGoogle adsAll moneyResult
2022Missouri 3rd District$3.6M39%$0 / $0–$3.6M✓ Won
2020Missouri 3rd District$2.0M78%$0 / $0–$2.0M✓ Won

Who wrote the checks

The PACs that gave the most across every run, and what kind of money it is.
Corporate $1.6MTrade group $810KMembership $200KOther $191KLeadership PAC $87KUnion $18KSuper PAC $1K

Outside money, for and against

Super PACs and party groups that spent the most on these races.

No outside spending of note.

Funding and votes

How their votes align with industry funding

Across 13 industry-vote comparisons with at least $10K in traced funding, they voted the industry's way 12 times (92%). This is a retrospective comparison using covered 2020–2026 runs; some money arrived after the vote. A vote can appear for multiple industries. Unknown coverage is excluded. “With industry” means its stated preferred side, and does not establish causation.
All issues →
VoteIndustryTheir money from itVoted
FIT21 (crypto market structure)House · 2024 · 279–136Crypto wanted yea$0Yea · with industry
Israel Security Assistance Support ActHouse · 2024 · 224–187Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$10KYea · with industry
SAB 121 repealHouse · 2024 · 228–182Crypto wanted yea$0Yea · with industry
Antisemitism Awareness ActHouse · 2024 · 320–91Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$10KYea · with industry
Israel security supplemental (Apr 2024)House · 2024 · 366–58Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$10KPresent / not voting
Ukraine security supplementalHouse · 2024 · 311–112Defense contractors wanted yea$25KPresent / not voting
Protecting Health Care for All Patients ActHouse · 2024 · 211–208Pharma and health care wanted yea$52KYea · with industry
Joint-employer rule repealHouse · 2024 · 206–177Labor unions wanted nay$47KPresent / not voting
NDAA FY2024House · 2023 · 310–118Defense contractors wanted yea$25KYea · with industry
Israel aid (Nov 2023)House · 2023 · 226–196Pro-Israel groups wanted yea$10KYea · with industry
Pistol brace rule repealHouse · 2023 · 219–210Gun lobby wanted yea$3KYea · with industry
Lower Energy Costs ActHouse · 2023 · 225–204Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$21KYea · with industry
Strategic Production Response ActHouse · 2023 · 221–205Oil, gas and coal wanted yea$21KYea · with industry
Merger Filing Fee Modernization ActHouse · 2022 · 242–184Tech and AI wanted nay$16KNay · with industry
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 2022 · 220–207Oil, gas and coal wanted nayPharma and health care wanted nayWall Street and hedge funds wanted nay$12K$35K$421KNay · with industryNay · with industryNay · with industry
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 2022 · 217–213Gun lobby wanted nay$2KNay · with industry
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 2022 · 234–193Gun lobby wanted nay$2KNay · with industry
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 2022 · 232–193Pharma and health care wanted nay$35KNay · with industry
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 2021 · 227–203Gun lobby wanted nay$2KNay · with industry
PRO Act (union organizing)House · 2021 · 225–206Labor unions wanted yea$24KNay · against

Constituents vs. funders

Voted the way most of their constituents wanted on 0 of 3 key votes (0%)

On 1 vote, industries that gave them $10K+ before the vote wanted the opposite of what most of their constituents wanted. They sided with the funders 1 time and with their constituents 0. Constituent views come from the Cooperative Election Study, a survey of about 60,000 adults a year. A side counts as what constituents wanted only when it leads by more than the margin of error; closer results are shown as split. Party explains most votes, and none of this shows that money changed a vote.
Who sides with funders →
VoteTheir constituentsTheir fundersVoted
Lower Energy Costs ActHouse · 202359% support ±15MO-03 · split · CES 2024 · related question$21K Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaYeaVoters split
Strategic Production Response ActHouse · 202359% support ±15MO-03 · split · CES 2024 · related question$21K Oil, gas and coal wanted yeaYeaVoters split
Inflation Reduction ActHouse · 202248% support ±13MO-03 · split · CES 2022$12K Oil, gas and coal wanted nay$35K Pharma and health care wanted nay$421K Wall Street and hedge funds wanted nayNayVoters split
Assault Weapons Ban of 2022House · 202243% support ±12MO-03 · split · CES 2022No industry with a side gave $10K+NayVoters split
Safer Communities Act (post-Uvalde)House · 202279% support ±4Missouri (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+NayAgainst voters
Affordable Insulin Now ActHouse · 202278% support ±10MO-03 · wanted Yea · CES 2022 · related question$35K Pharma and health care wanted nayNayFunders over voters
Bipartisan Background Checks ActHouse · 202189% support ±3Missouri (statewide figure) · wanted Yea · CES 2024No industry with a side gave $10K+NayAgainst voters

The revolving door

4 former aides now lobbying

Lobbyists who list a job in Blaine Luetkemeyer's office among the government positions they held, and who they now work for. A listed former position does not establish contact with that office.
  • Kristina WegerFormer congressional staff

    Health Policy and Communications Director, U.S. Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (MO); Intern, U.S. Sen. Roy Blunt (MO)

    Now lobbies for American Hospital Association, The Cigna Group And Subsidiaries (formerly Cigna Corporation And Subsidiaries), American Nurses Association

  • Roy McKenzieFormer congressional staff

    Legis. Correspondent, Rep. Luetkemeyer, May 2012 - June 2013; Intern, Sen. Boozman, May 2011 - July 2011

    Now lobbies for Chamber Of Commerce Of The U.S.A.

  • Lucas WestFormer congressional staff

    Congressman Blaine Luetkemeyer: Senior Policy Advisor, Legislative Director, Legislative Assistant, Legislative Correspondent, Staff Assistant.

    Now lobbies for Securities Industry And Financial Markets Association

  • Christy WoodruffFormer congressional staff

    *Lobbying contacts limited to the House*; Staff Asst, L.C., L.A., Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer [06/10-01/14]; L.A., Sen. Mike Lee [02/14-08/15]; Policy Advisor, S…

    Now lobbies for Google Client Services LLC

The revolving door, industry by industry →

Figures are the candidate's principal committees as filed with the FEC, cycle by cycle. See About the data.

Questions people ask

Who funded Blaine Luetkemeyer's 2022 campaign?
Blaine Luetkemeyer (Republican) raised $3.6M for the 2022 Missouri 3rd District race, $1.4M of it from PACs, and outside groups spent $0 for and $0 against them (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). They won.
Which PACs gave the most to Blaine Luetkemeyer?
Protective Life Corporation Federal Political Action Committee ('Protectpac') ($10K), National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies PAC ($10K), Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America, Inc. Political Action Committee (Insurpac) ($10K), The Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers Political Action Committee ($10K), Innovation Political Action Committee ($10K) in 2022.
How much has Blaine Luetkemeyer raised across elections?
$3.6M in 2022, $2.0M in 2020. Receipts are counted once per candidate and cycle.