← All super PACs

Outside spender

Sf for All

FEC committee C00945303

Backed losers

Sf for All spent $1.6M on independent expenditures in the 2026 federal elections, and 89% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 21% were on the winning side ($314K won, $1.2M lost). $77K had no matched result and is excluded.

Outside spending

$1.6M

Winning share of scored dollars

21%

$1.5M scored (95% of spending); $77K unknown

On the losing side

$1.2M

Supporting vs attacking

84% / 16%

$1.3M for, $242K against

Google says Sf for All also spent $112K on Google and YouTube ads this cycle (7% of its FEC-reported outside spending). All ad buyers →

Follow the money

Who filled the envelope

The donor records in this snapshot trace $1.8M to Sf for All. This is incomplete funding coverage; percentages below refer only to these traced gifts. The allocation denominator is $2.4M.
All big donors →
  • National Nurses United for Patient ProtectionAnother PAC$350K (20%)
  • Unite Here Tip State & Local FundCompany / nonprofit$284K (16%)
  • Unite HereCompany / nonprofit$265K (15%)
  • Ibew PAC Educational FundCompany / nonprofit$185K (10%)
  • California State Pipe Trades Council Voluntary Federal Political Action FundAnother PAC$150K (8%)
  • Ua Union Plumblers & Pipefitters Vote! PACAnother PAC$100K (6%)
  • Brewster KahleIndividual$100K (6%)
  • San Francisco Labor Council Labor and Neighbor Independent Expenditure Political Action CoCompany / nonprofit$85K (5%)
  • United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Pipe Fitting Industry of the UniteCompany / nonprofit$50K (3%)
  • Kenson Group LLCCompany / nonprofit$50K (3%)

The people behind it

The people giving to Sf for All

3 named people gave $103K in itemized gifts this cycle. These are the biggest. Committees must name anyone who gives more than $200 in a year; smaller gifts are reported only as a lump sum, and money from companies, unions and other groups is not in this list.
  • Brewster KahleDigital Librarian · Internet Acrhive · CA$100K
  • Vincent PanCo-Executive Director · Chinese for Affirmative Action · CA$3K
  • Sousdey PennAdvertising Creative Director · Independent Contractor/Self-Employed · CA$500

Names, employers and occupations are as the committee reported them to the FEC. People with the same name in the same state are counted as one person. Federal law bars using these names to ask for money or for any commercial purpose.

Where the money went

Biggest targets, with whether each one won.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched
CandidateRaceSpendingAmountWon?
Connie ChanCalifornia 11th DistrictSupporting$1.0M✗ No
Connie ChanCalifornia 11th District (primary)Supporting$314K✓ Yes
Scott WienerCalifornia 11th DistrictAttacking$166K✗ No
Saikat ChakrabartiCalifornia 11th District (primary)Attacking$77KUnknown

Questions people ask

How much did Sf for All spend in 2026, and did it win?
Sf for All spent $1.6M on independent expenditures in the 2026 federal elections, and 89% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 21% were on the winning side ($314K won, $1.2M lost). $77K had no matched result and is excluded.
Who funds Sf for All?
Its biggest reported donors in the 2026 cycle were National Nurses United for Patient Protection ($350K), Unite Here Tip State & Local Fund ($284K), Unite Here ($265K), Ibew PAC Educational Fund ($185K), California State Pipe Trades Council Voluntary Federal Political Action Fund ($150K), out of $1.8M received from donors tracked here.
Which candidates did Sf for All spend the most on in 2026?
for Connie Chan (California 11th District, $1.0M, lost); for Connie Chan (California 11th District, $314K, won); against Scott Wiener (California 11th District, $166K, lost).