American Chemistry Council Inc spent $1.0M on independent expenditures in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 53% were on the winning side ($527K won, $473K lost). $0 had no matched result and is excluded.
Outside spending
$1.0M
Winning share of scored dollars
53%
$1.0M scored (100% of spending); $0 unknown
On the losing side
$473K
Supporting vs attacking
100% / 0%
$1.0M for, $0 against
Where the money went
Biggest targets, with whether each one won.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched
| Candidate | Race | Spending | Amount | Won? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jon Husted | Ohio Senate (special) | Supporting | $385K | ✗ No |
| Dan J. Sullivan | Alaska Senate (primary) | Supporting | $219K | ✓ Yes |
| Gary Palmer | Alabama 6th District (primary) | Supporting | $131K | ✓ Yes |
| Nick Langworthy | New York 23rd District | Supporting | $96K | ✓ Yes |
| Gabe Evans | Colorado 8th District | Supporting | $88K | ✗ No |
| Brett Guthrie | Kentucky 2nd District (primary) | Supporting | $80K | ✓ Yes |
Questions people ask
- How much did American Chemistry Council Inc spend in 2026, and did it win?
- American Chemistry Council Inc spent $1.0M on independent expenditures in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 53% were on the winning side ($527K won, $473K lost). $0 had no matched result and is excluded.
- Which candidates did American Chemistry Council Inc spend the most on in 2026?
- for Jon Husted (Ohio Senate (special), $385K, lost); for Dan J. Sullivan (Alaska Senate, $219K, won); for Gary Palmer (Alabama 6th District, $131K, won).