Who funds Sf for All?

Its biggest reported donors in the 2026 cycle were National Nurses United for Patient Protection ($350K), Unite Here Tip State & Local Fund ($284K), Unite Here ($265K), Ibew PAC Educational Fund ($185K), California State Pipe Trades Council Voluntary Federal Political Action Fund ($150K), out of $1.8M received from donors tracked here.

Which candidates did Sf for All spend the most on in 2026?

for Connie Chan (California 11th District, $1.0M, pending); for Connie Chan (California 11th District, $314K, won); against Scott Wiener (California 11th District, $166K, pending).

← All super PACs

Outside spender

Sf for All

FEC committee C00945303

Ahead so far

Sf for All spent $1.6M on independent expenditures in the 2026 federal elections, and 89% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 100% were on the winning side ($314K won, $0 lost, with $1.2M in races still being counted). $77K had no matched result and is excluded.

Outside spending

$1.6M

Winning share of scored dollars

100%

$314K scored (20% of spending); $77K unknown

On the losing side

$1.2M still being counted

Supporting vs attacking

84% / 16%

$1.3M for, $242K against

Google says Sf for All also spent $112K on Google and YouTube ads this cycle (7% of its FEC-reported outside spending). All ad buyers →

Follow the money

Who filled the envelope

The donor records in this snapshot trace $1.8M to Sf for All. This is incomplete funding coverage; percentages below refer only to these traced gifts. The allocation denominator is $2.4M.

All big donors →

National Nurses United for Patient ProtectionAnother PAC$350K (20%)
Unite Here Tip State & Local FundCompany / nonprofit$284K (16%)
Unite HereCompany / nonprofit$265K (15%)
Ibew PAC Educational FundCompany / nonprofit$185K (10%)
California State Pipe Trades Council Voluntary Federal Political Action FundAnother PAC$150K (8%)
Ua Union Plumblers & Pipefitters Vote! PACAnother PAC$100K (6%)
Brewster KahleIndividual$100K (6%)
San Francisco Labor Council Labor and Neighbor Independent Expenditure Political Action CoCompany / nonprofit$85K (5%)
United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Pipe Fitting Industry of the UniteCompany / nonprofit$50K (3%)
Kenson Group LLCCompany / nonprofit$50K (3%)

Where the money went

Biggest targets, with whether each one paid off.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Candidate	Race	Spending	Amount	Paid off?
Connie Chan	California 11th District	Supporting	$1.0M	Counting
Connie Chan	California 11th District (primary)	Supporting	$314K	✓ Yes
Scott Wiener	California 11th District	Attacking	$166K	Counting
Saikat Chakrabarti	California 11th District (primary)	Attacking	$77K	Unknown

Questions people ask

How much did Sf for All spend in 2026, and did it win?: Sf for All spent $1.6M on independent expenditures in the 2026 federal elections, and 89% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 100% were on the winning side ($314K won, $0 lost, with $1.2M in races still being counted). $77K had no matched result and is excluded.
Who funds Sf for All?: Its biggest reported donors in the 2026 cycle were National Nurses United for Patient Protection ($350K), Unite Here Tip State & Local Fund ($284K), Unite Here ($265K), Ibew PAC Educational Fund ($185K), California State Pipe Trades Council Voluntary Federal Political Action Fund ($150K), out of $1.8M received from donors tracked here.
Which candidates did Sf for All spend the most on in 2026?: for Connie Chan (California 11th District, $1.0M, pending); for Connie Chan (California 11th District, $314K, won); against Scott Wiener (California 11th District, $166K, pending).