Which super PACs did United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC) fund in 2026?

Elect Chicago Women Aka Ecw ($4.0M), Bold America ($2.8M), Edw Action Fund ($2.4M), Affordable Chicago Now! ($1.3M).

Which candidates did United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC)'s money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

for Laura Fine (Illinois 9th District, about $1.7M, unknown); for Melissa Bean (Illinois 8th District, about $1.4M, won); for Donna Miller (Illinois 2nd District, about $1.3M, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC)

Another PAC

15 reported gifts; 4 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed winners

United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC) gave $10M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 98% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 78% were on the winning side ($4.5M won, $1.2M lost, with $589K in races still being counted). $2.1M had no matched result and is excluded.

The AIPAC network: $67M

AIPAC's money reaches elections four ways: members' gifts earmarked to candidates through its PAC, the PAC's own checks, its super PAC's outside spending, and that super PAC's gifts to other groups.

AIPAC PAC: its own checks to candidates
271 candidates
$2.6M
United Democracy Project: outside spending
Raised $112.8M through 2026-10-14
$54M
United Democracy Project: gifts to other super PACs (this page)
4 groups
$10M
AIPAC's own gift to United Democracy Project
Already inside the super PAC's money above
$30M

The total adds the money that reached candidates, races or other groups. A struck-through amount is money already inside another line, so it is shown but not added twice.

Gave to outside spenders

$10M

98% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

78%

$5.7M scored (54% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$1.2M

$589K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$4.2M

$2.1M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $2.1M has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Elect Chicago Women Aka Ecw $536K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$4.0M	$1.4M / $506K
Bold America	$2.8M	$1.2M / $735K
Edw Action Fund $1.5M not allocated to tracked outside spending	$2.4M	$553K / $0
Affordable Chicago Now! $33K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$1.3M	$1.3M / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC)'s money was spent for or against, pro-rated by United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC)'s share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Laura Fine	Illinois 9th District (primary)	Supporting	$1.7M	Unknown
Melissa Bean	Illinois 8th District (primary)	Supporting	$1.4M	✓ Yes
Donna Miller	Illinois 2nd District (primary)	Supporting	$1.3M	✓ Yes
Daniel Biss	Illinois 9th District (primary)	Attacking	$506K	✗ No
Amish Shah	Arizona 1st District (primary)	Attacking	$365K	✗ No
Darializa Avila Chevalier	New York 13th District (primary)	Attacking	$319K	✗ No
Monica De La Cruz	Texas 15th District	Attacking	$313K	✓ Yes
Melissa Hernandez	California 14th District	Supporting	$292K	Counting
Adriano Espaillat	New York 13th District (primary)	Supporting	$286K	Unknown
Eric Flores	Texas 34th District	Attacking	$251K	✓ Yes
Anthony DiLorenzo	New Hampshire 1st District	Attacking	$180K	✓ Yes
Denise Powell	Nebraska 2nd District (primary)	Supporting	$135K	✓ Yes

Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC) spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC) gave $10M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 98% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 78% were on the winning side ($4.5M won, $1.2M lost, with $589K in races still being counted). $2.1M had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC) fund in 2026?: Elect Chicago Women Aka Ecw ($4.0M), Bold America ($2.8M), Edw Action Fund ($2.4M), Affordable Chicago Now! ($1.3M).
Which candidates did United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC)'s money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: for Laura Fine (Illinois 9th District, about $1.7M, unknown); for Melissa Bean (Illinois 8th District, about $1.4M, won); for Donna Miller (Illinois 2nd District, about $1.3M, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.