Donor

Yes On 50, the Election Rigging Response Act Governor Newsom's Ballot Committee

Company / nonprofit

California

1 gift to 1 group, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Winner

Yes On 50, the Election Rigging Response Act Governor Newsom's Ballot Committee gave $3.0M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 99% ended up on the winning side ($2.3M won, $15K lost, with $648K in races still being counted).

Gave to outside spenders

$3.0M

100% of it helped Democrats

Ended up on the winning side

99%

$2.3M of the dollars in races already called

Spent on the losing side

$15K

$648K still being counted

No result matched

$2K

Mostly primaries where the backed candidate's fate is not tracked

Where the cheques went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	How the group spent it	Won / lost
House Majority PAC	$3.0M		$2.3M / $15K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Yes On 50, the Election Rigging Response Act Governor Newsom's Ballot Committee's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Yes On 50, the Election Rigging Response Act Governor Newsom's Ballot Committee's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Scott Singer	Florida 25th District	Attacking	$178K	✓ Yes
Tom Barrett	Michigan 7th District	Attacking	$144K	✓ Yes
Casey Askar	Florida 22nd District	Attacking	$130K	✓ Yes
Laurie Buckhout	North Carolina 1st District	Attacking	$118K	✓ Yes
Mike Bouchard Jr.	Michigan 10th District	Attacking	$116K	✓ Yes
Eric Flores	Texas 34th District	Attacking	$103K	✓ Yes
Paul LePage	Maine 2nd District	Attacking	$95K	Counting
Derrick Van Orden	Wisconsin 3rd District	Attacking	$94K	✓ Yes
Mike Beltran	Florida 14th District	Attacking	$93K	✓ Yes
David Valadao	California 22nd District	Attacking	$91K	✓ Yes
Brian Fitzpatrick	Pennsylvania 1st District	Attacking	$89K	✓ Yes
John Braun	Washington 3rd District	Attacking	$86K	✓ Yes

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Yes On 50, the Election Rigging Response Act Governor Newsom's Ballot Committee spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: Yes On 50, the Election Rigging Response Act Governor Newsom's Ballot Committee gave $3.0M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 99% ended up on the winning side ($2.3M won, $15K lost, with $648K in races still being counted).
Which super PACs did Yes On 50, the Election Rigging Response Act Governor Newsom's Ballot Committee fund in 2026?: House Majority PAC ($3.0M).
Which candidates did Yes On 50, the Election Rigging Response Act Governor Newsom's Ballot Committee's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: against Scott Singer (Florida 25th District, about $178K, won); against Tom Barrett (Michigan 7th District, about $144K, won); against Casey Askar (Florida 22nd District, about $130K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.