← All donors

Donor

United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC)

Another PAC

DC

15 gifts to 4 groups, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Winner

United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC) gave $10M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 84% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 79% ended up on the winning side ($4.6M won, $1.2M lost, with $622K in races still being counted).

Gave to outside spenders

$10M

84% of it helped Democrats

Ended up on the winning side

79%

$4.6M of the dollars in races already called

Spent on the losing side

$1.2M

$622K still being counted

Not spent yet

$4.0M

Sitting with groups that have not spent

Where the cheques went

Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
Elect Chicago Women Aka Ecw

$483K not spent yet

$4.0M
$1.4M / $514K
Bold America$2.8M
$1.1M / $735K
Edw Action Fund

$1.4M not spent yet

$2.4M
$708K / $0
Affordable Chicago Now!

$28K not spent yet

$1.3M
$1.3M / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC)'s money was spent for or against, pro-rated by United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC)'s share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Laura FineIllinois 9th District (primary)Supporting$1.7MUnknown
Melissa BeanIllinois 8th District (primary)Supporting$1.4M✓ Yes
Donna MillerIllinois 2nd District (primary)Supporting$1.3M✓ Yes
Daniel BissIllinois 9th District (primary)Attacking$514K✗ No
Melissa HernandezCalifornia 14th DistrictSupporting$384KCounting
Amish ShahArizona 1st District (primary)Attacking$365K✗ No
Darializa Avila ChevalierNew York 13th District (primary)Attacking$319K✗ No
Monica De La CruzTexas 15th DistrictAttacking$313K✓ Yes
Adriano EspaillatNew York 13th District (primary)Supporting$286KUnknown
Eric FloresTexas 34th DistrictAttacking$251K✓ Yes
Anthony DiLorenzoNew Hampshire 1st DistrictAttacking$212K✓ Yes
Denise PowellNebraska 2nd District (primary)Supporting$143K✓ Yes

Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC) spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?
United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC) gave $10M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 84% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 79% ended up on the winning side ($4.6M won, $1.2M lost, with $622K in races still being counted).
Which super PACs did United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC) fund in 2026?
Elect Chicago Women Aka Ecw ($4.0M), Bold America ($2.8M), Edw Action Fund ($2.4M), Affordable Chicago Now! ($1.3M).
Which candidates did United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC)'s money end up backing or attacking in 2026?
for Laura Fine (Illinois 9th District, about $1.7M, unknown); for Melissa Bean (Illinois 8th District, about $1.4M, won); for Donna Miller (Illinois 2nd District, about $1.3M, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.