Which super PACs did Stand Together Inc. fund in 2026?

Americans for Prosperity Action ($20M).

Which candidates did Stand Together Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

against Sherrod Brown (Ohio Senate (special), about $2.1M, lost); against Abdul El-Sayed (Michigan Senate, about $2.0M, lost); for Jon Husted (Ohio Senate (special), about $1.8M, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Stand Together Inc.

Dark money

Virginia

2 reported gifts; 1 recipient group listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Loser

Stand Together Inc. gave $20M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 14% were on the winning side ($2.3M won, $14M lost, with $1.5M in races still being counted). $0 had no matched result and is excluded.

Koch network nonprofit. It does not disclose its donors.

Gave to outside spenders

$20M

100% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

14%

$16M scored (81% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$14M

$1.5M still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$2.4M

$2.4M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $0 has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the trail ends

What the IRS sees

Stand Together Inc. has given $20M to outside spenders across the cycles on this site. No matching Form 990 record was located in this lookup. That does not establish that the organization failed to file or that no return is publicly available.

Where the cheques went

A nonprofit that does not have to say where its own money came from. The trail ends here. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	How the group spent it	Won / lost
Americans for Prosperity Action $2.4M not allocated to tracked outside spending	$20M		$2.3M / $14M

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Stand Together Inc.'s money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Stand Together Inc.'s share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Sherrod Brown	Ohio Senate (special)	Attacking	$2.1M	✗ No
Abdul El-Sayed	Michigan Senate	Attacking	$2.0M	✗ No
Jon Husted	Ohio Senate (special)	Supporting	$1.8M	✗ No
Mike Rogers	Michigan Senate	Supporting	$1.8M	✗ No
Ashley Hinson	Iowa Senate	Supporting	$1.3M	✗ No
Josh Turek	Iowa Senate	Attacking	$1.1M	✗ No
Chris Pappas	New Hampshire Senate	Attacking	$822K	✗ No
Mike Rogers	Michigan Senate (primary)	Supporting	$800K	✓ Yes
Mary Peltola	Alaska Senate	Attacking	$643K	Counting
John E. Sununu	New Hampshire Senate	Supporting	$572K	✗ No
Dan J. Sullivan	Alaska Senate	Supporting	$545K	Counting
John E. Sununu	New Hampshire Senate (primary)	Supporting	$511K	✓ Yes

Dark money as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Stand Together Inc. spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: Stand Together Inc. gave $20M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 14% were on the winning side ($2.3M won, $14M lost, with $1.5M in races still being counted). $0 had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Stand Together Inc. fund in 2026?: Americans for Prosperity Action ($20M).
Which candidates did Stand Together Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: against Sherrod Brown (Ohio Senate (special), about $2.1M, lost); against Abdul El-Sayed (Michigan Senate, about $2.0M, lost); for Jon Husted (Ohio Senate (special), about $1.8M, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.