Which super PACs did Global Impact Social Welfare Fund fund in 2026?

Votevets ($3.0M), The 1861 Initiative ($300K), Wheel Dog PAC ($250K), Government That Works PAC ($250K), Fight for Nebraska PAC ($250K).

Which candidates did Global Impact Social Welfare Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

for Josh Turek (Iowa Senate, about $867K, won); against Ashley Hinson (Iowa Senate, about $867K, won); for Maura Sullivan (New Hampshire 1st District, about $201K, unknown). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Global Impact Social Welfare Fund

Company / nonprofit

8 gifts to 7 groups, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Winner

Global Impact Social Welfare Fund gave $4.4M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 96% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 92% ended up on the winning side ($3.0M won, $246K lost, with $528K in races still being counted).

Gave to outside spenders

$4.4M

96% of it helped Democrats

Ended up on the winning side

92%

$3.0M of the dollars in races already called

Spent on the losing side

$246K

$528K still being counted

Not spent yet

$625K

Sitting with groups that have not spent

Where the cheques went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Votevets	$3.0M	$2.2M / $59K
The 1861 Initiative	$300K	$136K / $0
Wheel Dog PAC	$250K	$75K / $1K
Government That Works PAC	$250K	$218K / $2K
Fight for Nebraska PAC $32K not spent yet	$250K	$218K / $0
Montana Freedom PAC	$200K	$17K / $183K
Your Community PAC	$130K	$74K / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Global Impact Social Welfare Fund's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Global Impact Social Welfare Fund's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Josh Turek	Iowa Senate	Supporting	$867K	✓ Yes
Ashley Hinson	Iowa Senate	Attacking	$867K	✓ Yes
Maura Sullivan	New Hampshire 1st District (primary)	Supporting	$201K	Unknown
Matthew Maasdam	Michigan 7th District (primary)	Supporting	$186K	Unknown
Noah Taylor	Kansas Senate (primary)	Supporting	$164K	Unknown
Bill Hill	Alaska at-large House seat (primary)	Supporting	$160K	✓ Yes
Roger Marshall	Kansas Senate	Attacking	$158K	✓ Yes
Seth Bodnar	Montana Senate	Supporting	$150K	✗ No
Denise Powell	Nebraska 2nd District (primary)	Supporting	$145K	✓ Yes
Juan Ciscomani	Arizona 6th District	Attacking	$110K	Counting
Cait Conley	New York 17th District (primary)	Supporting	$93K	✓ Yes
Luke Bronin	Connecticut 1st District (primary)	Supporting	$90K	✓ Yes

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Global Impact Social Welfare Fund spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: Global Impact Social Welfare Fund gave $4.4M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 96% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 92% ended up on the winning side ($3.0M won, $246K lost, with $528K in races still being counted).
Which super PACs did Global Impact Social Welfare Fund fund in 2026?: Votevets ($3.0M), The 1861 Initiative ($300K), Wheel Dog PAC ($250K), Government That Works PAC ($250K), Fight for Nebraska PAC ($250K).
Which candidates did Global Impact Social Welfare Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: for Josh Turek (Iowa Senate, about $867K, won); against Ashley Hinson (Iowa Senate, about $867K, won); for Maura Sullivan (New Hampshire 1st District, about $201K, unknown). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.