← All donors

Donor

American Action Network

Dark money

DC

7 gifts to 1 group, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Loser

American Action Network gave $64M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 0% ended up on the winning side ($159K won, $49M lost, with $6.8M in races still being counted).

Nonprofit tied to the Congressional Leadership Fund. It does not disclose its donors.

Gave to outside spenders

$64M

100% of it helped Republicans

Ended up on the winning side

0%

$159K of the dollars in races already called

Spent on the losing side

$49M

$6.8M still being counted

Not spent yet

$8.4M

Sitting with groups that have not spent

Where the trail ends

What the IRS sees

American Action Network Inc is a 501(c)(4) social welfare group based in Washington, DC. It files a Form 990 with the IRS every year that shows how much money it moves, but never who gave it. That is the whole point of routing money this way.
IRS filings on ProPublica →

Revenue, 2023

$46M

from donors it does not have to name

Spent, 2023

$66M

Assets at year end, 2023

$16M

Tax yearRevenueSpentAssetsFiling
2023$46M$66M$16M990 PDF
2022$90M$62M$31M990 PDF
2021$30M$35M$3.7Me-file
2020$48M$42M$8.9M990 PDF
2019$29M$32M$3.7M990 PDF
2018$52M$51M$6.5M990 PDF
2024filed, not yet digitised990 PDF

The $64M it gave to super PACs in 2026 is 139% of what it took in during 2023, its latest year on file. The 990 lists what it spent on politics in a single line and leaves every donor blank.

American Action Network also bought $12M of Google and YouTube ads under its own name this cycle. All ad buyers →

Where the cheques went

A nonprofit that does not have to say where its own money came from. The trail ends here. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
Congressional Leadership Fund

$8.4M not spent yet

$64M
$159K / $49M

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates American Action Network's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by American Action Network's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Christina HinesMichigan 10th DistrictAttacking$3.7M✗ No
Don DavisNorth Carolina 1st DistrictAttacking$3.2M✗ No
William LawrenceMichigan 7th DistrictAttacking$3.0M✗ No
Cait ConleyNew York 17th DistrictAttacking$2.8M✗ No
Randy VillegasCalifornia 22nd DistrictAttacking$2.5M✗ No
Bob BrooksPennsylvania 7th DistrictAttacking$2.2M✗ No
Manny RutinelColorado 8th DistrictAttacking$2.1M✗ No
Vicente GonzalezTexas 34th DistrictAttacking$2.0M✗ No
Kathy CastorFlorida 14th DistrictAttacking$1.8M✗ No
Amish ShahArizona 1st DistrictAttacking$1.8MCounting
Matthew DunlapMaine 2nd DistrictAttacking$1.7MCounting
Marie Gluesenkamp PerezWashington 3rd DistrictAttacking$1.7M✗ No

Dark money as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did American Action Network spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?
American Action Network gave $64M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 0% ended up on the winning side ($159K won, $49M lost, with $6.8M in races still being counted).
Which super PACs did American Action Network fund in 2026?
Congressional Leadership Fund ($64M).
Which candidates did American Action Network's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?
against Christina Hines (Michigan 10th District, about $3.7M, lost); against Don Davis (North Carolina 1st District, about $3.2M, lost); against William Lawrence (Michigan 7th District, about $3.0M, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.