Which super PACs did Nea Advocacy Fund fund in 2026?

House Majority PAC ($2.0M), Kentuckians Not Corruption ($100K).

Which candidates did Nea Advocacy Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

against Scott Singer (Florida 25th District, about $112K, won); against Tom Barrett (Michigan 7th District, about $91K, won); against Casey Askar (Florida 22nd District, about $82K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Nea Advocacy Fund

Another PAC

4 reported gifts; 2 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed winners

Nea Advocacy Fund gave $2.1M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 99% were on the winning side ($1.8M won, $10K lost, with $220K in races still being counted). $1K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$2.1M

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

99%

$1.8M scored (84% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$10K

$220K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$112K

$111K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $1K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	How the group spent it	Won / lost
House Majority PAC $111K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$2.0M		$1.7M / $10K
Kentuckians Not Corruption	$100K		$100K / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Nea Advocacy Fund's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Nea Advocacy Fund's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Scott Singer	Florida 25th District	Attacking	$112K	✓ Yes
Tom Barrett	Michigan 7th District	Attacking	$91K	✓ Yes
Casey Askar	Florida 22nd District	Attacking	$82K	✓ Yes
Ralph Alvarado	Kentucky 6th District	Attacking	$79K	✓ Yes
Laurie Buckhout	North Carolina 1st District	Attacking	$74K	✓ Yes
Mike Bouchard Jr.	Michigan 10th District	Attacking	$73K	✓ Yes
Eric Flores	Texas 34th District	Attacking	$65K	✓ Yes
Paul LePage	Maine 2nd District	Attacking	$60K	Counting
Derrick Van Orden	Wisconsin 3rd District	Attacking	$59K	✓ Yes
Mike Beltran	Florida 14th District	Attacking	$59K	✓ Yes
David Valadao	California 22nd District	Attacking	$58K	✓ Yes
Brian Fitzpatrick	Pennsylvania 1st District	Attacking	$56K	✓ Yes

Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Nea Advocacy Fund spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: Nea Advocacy Fund gave $2.1M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 99% were on the winning side ($1.8M won, $10K lost, with $220K in races still being counted). $1K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Nea Advocacy Fund fund in 2026?: House Majority PAC ($2.0M), Kentuckians Not Corruption ($100K).
Which candidates did Nea Advocacy Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: against Scott Singer (Florida 25th District, about $112K, won); against Tom Barrett (Michigan 7th District, about $91K, won); against Casey Askar (Florida 22nd District, about $82K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.