← All donors

Donor

Charles Johnson

Individual

Retired, Retired · Florida

96 reported gifts; 11 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Loser

Charles Johnson gave $1.6M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 2% were on the winning side ($17K won, $1.1M lost, with $137K in races still being counted). $239 had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$1.6M

100% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

2%

$1.1M scored (67% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$1.1M

$137K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$399K

$399K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $239 has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the cheques went

A person writing cheques from their own fortune. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
Congressional Leadership Fund

$150K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$1.0M
$2K / $745K
Senate Leadership Fund

$189K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$525K
$13K / $305K
NRCC

$45K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$45K
$0 / $0
Last Frontier PAC$25K
$0 / $9K
The Sentinel Action Fund

$10K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$20K
$1K / $8K
DSCC

$3K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$3K
$0 / $0
NRSC

$1K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$1K
$0 / $0
DCCC

$700 not allocated to tracked outside spending

$700
$0 / $0
House Majority PAC

$7 not allocated to tracked outside spending

$126
$94 / $1
Common Sense for America PAC

$80 not allocated to tracked outside spending

$100
$1 / $17
Progressive Turnout Project

$17 not allocated to tracked outside spending

$25
$6 / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Charles Johnson's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Charles Johnson's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Sherrod BrownOhio Senate (special)Attacking$91K✗ No
Christina HinesMichigan 10th DistrictAttacking$56K✗ No
Don DavisNorth Carolina 1st DistrictAttacking$49K✗ No
Abdul El-SayedMichigan SenateAttacking$47K✗ No
Josh TurekIowa SenateAttacking$46K✗ No
William LawrenceMichigan 7th DistrictAttacking$46K✗ No
Cait ConleyNew York 17th DistrictAttacking$43K✗ No
Randy VillegasCalifornia 22nd DistrictAttacking$37K✗ No
Troy JacksonMaine SenateAttacking$36K✗ No
Bob BrooksPennsylvania 7th DistrictAttacking$33K✗ No
Manny RutinelColorado 8th DistrictAttacking$32K✗ No
Mary PeltolaAlaska SenateAttacking$31KCounting

Individual as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Charles Johnson spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?
Charles Johnson gave $1.6M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 2% were on the winning side ($17K won, $1.1M lost, with $137K in races still being counted). $239 had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Charles Johnson fund in 2026?
Congressional Leadership Fund ($1.0M), Senate Leadership Fund ($525K), NRCC ($45K), Last Frontier PAC ($25K), The Sentinel Action Fund ($20K).
Which candidates did Charles Johnson's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?
against Sherrod Brown (Ohio Senate (special), about $91K, lost); against Christina Hines (Michigan 10th District, about $56K, lost); against Don Davis (North Carolina 1st District, about $49K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.