Which super PACs did Anthony Davis fund in 2026?

Elect Chicago Women Aka Ecw ($1.5M), Pine Tree Results PAC ($750K), Chicago Progressive Partnership ($500K), Affordable Chicago Now! ($500K), Government That Works PAC ($150K).

Which candidates did Anthony Davis's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

for Laura Fine (Illinois 9th District, about $590K, unknown); for Melissa Bean (Illinois 8th District, about $537K, won); against Troy Jackson (Maine Senate, about $491K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Anthony Davis

Individual

President/Managing Partner, Linden Capital Partners · Illinois

12 gifts to 7 groups, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Winner

Anthony Davis gave $3.4M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 56% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 71% ended up on the winning side ($1.7M won, $684K lost, with $18K in races still being counted).

Gave to outside spenders

$3.4M

56% of it helped Democrats

Ended up on the winning side

71%

$1.7M of the dollars in races already called

Spent on the losing side

$684K

$18K still being counted

Not spent yet

$987K

Sitting with groups that have not spent

Where the cheques went

A person writing cheques from their own fortune. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Elect Chicago Women Aka Ecw $181K not spent yet	$1.5M	$537K / $192K
Pine Tree Results PAC	$750K	$97K / $491K
Chicago Progressive Partnership $17K not spent yet	$500K	$457K / $0
Affordable Chicago Now! $10K not spent yet	$500K	$490K / $0
Government That Works PAC	$150K	$131K / $1K
Progressive Turnout Project	$217	$167 / $11
DSCC No outside spending reported yet	$100	$0 / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Anthony Davis's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Anthony Davis's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Laura Fine	Illinois 9th District (primary)	Supporting	$590K	Unknown
Melissa Bean	Illinois 8th District (primary)	Supporting	$537K	✓ Yes
Troy Jackson	Maine Senate	Attacking	$491K	✗ No
Donna Miller	Illinois 2nd District (primary)	Supporting	$490K	✓ Yes
Katherine M. Abughazaleh	Illinois 9th District (primary)	Attacking	$293K	✓ Yes
Graham Platner	Maine Senate	Attacking	$259K	Unknown
Daniel Biss	Illinois 9th District (primary)	Attacking	$192K	✗ No
Junaid Ahmed	Illinois 8th District (primary)	Attacking	$164K	✓ Yes
Darline Graham	South Carolina Senate	Attacking	$31K	✓ Yes
Bushra Amiwala	Illinois 9th District (primary)	Supporting	$26K	Unknown
Annie Andrews	South Carolina Senate	Supporting	$19K	✓ Yes
Adam Hamilton	Kansas Senate	Supporting	$19K	✓ Yes

Individual as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Anthony Davis spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: Anthony Davis gave $3.4M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 56% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 71% ended up on the winning side ($1.7M won, $684K lost, with $18K in races still being counted).
Which super PACs did Anthony Davis fund in 2026?: Elect Chicago Women Aka Ecw ($1.5M), Pine Tree Results PAC ($750K), Chicago Progressive Partnership ($500K), Affordable Chicago Now! ($500K), Government That Works PAC ($150K).
Which candidates did Anthony Davis's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: for Laura Fine (Illinois 9th District, about $590K, unknown); for Melissa Bean (Illinois 8th District, about $537K, won); against Troy Jackson (Maine Senate, about $491K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.