← All donors

Donor

Global Impact Social Welfare Fund

Company / nonprofit

DC

8 reported gifts; 7 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed winners

Global Impact Social Welfare Fund gave $4.4M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 90% were on the winning side ($2.0M won, $221K lost, with $258K in races still being counted). $473K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$4.4M

99% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

90%

$2.2M scored (51% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$221K

$258K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$1.9M

$1.4M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $473K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
Votevets

$1.2M not allocated to tracked outside spending

$3.0M
$1.5M / $36K
The 1861 Initiative

$41K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$300K
$118K / $0
Wheel Dog PAC$250K
$75K / $1K
Government That Works PAC

$138K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$250K
$98K / $888
Fight for Nebraska PAC

$32K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$250K
$145K / $0
Montana Freedom PAC$200K
$17K / $183K
Your Community PAC$130K
$98K / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Global Impact Social Welfare Fund's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Global Impact Social Welfare Fund's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Ashley HinsonIowa SenateAttacking$520K✓ Yes
Josh TurekIowa Senate (primary)Supporting$507K✓ Yes
Seth BodnarMontana SenateSupporting$146K✗ No
Denise PowellNebraska 2nd District (primary)Supporting$145K✓ Yes
Noah TaylorKansas Senate (primary)Supporting$141KUnknown
Roger MarshallKansas SenateAttacking$128K✓ Yes
Maura SullivanNew Hampshire 1st District (primary)Supporting$121KUnknown
Matthew MaasdamMichigan 7th District (primary)Supporting$112KUnknown
Bill HillAlaska at-large House seatSupporting$85KCounting
Nick Begich IIIAlaska at-large House seatAttacking$83KCounting
Bill HillAlaska at-large House seat (primary)Supporting$75K✓ Yes
John CavanaughNebraska 2nd District (primary)Attacking$73KUnknown

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Global Impact Social Welfare Fund spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?
Global Impact Social Welfare Fund gave $4.4M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 90% were on the winning side ($2.0M won, $221K lost, with $258K in races still being counted). $473K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Global Impact Social Welfare Fund fund in 2026?
Votevets ($3.0M), The 1861 Initiative ($300K), Wheel Dog PAC ($250K), Government That Works PAC ($250K), Fight for Nebraska PAC ($250K).
Which candidates did Global Impact Social Welfare Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?
against Ashley Hinson (Iowa Senate, about $520K, won); for Josh Turek (Iowa Senate, about $507K, won); for Seth Bodnar (Montana Senate, about $146K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.