Which super PACs did Fanduel Inc. fund in 2026?

House Majority PAC ($500K), Congressional Leadership Fund ($500K), Senate Majority PAC ($500K), Senate Leadership Fund ($500K).

Which candidates did Fanduel Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

against Sherrod Brown (Ohio Senate (special), about $84K, lost); against Josh Turek (Iowa Senate, about $44K, lost); against Abdul El-Sayed (Michigan Senate, about $42K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Fanduel Inc.

Company / nonprofit

New York

4 reported gifts; 4 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Mixed results

Fanduel Inc. gave $2.0M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 61% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 38% were on the winning side ($428K won, $698K lost, with $91K in races still being counted). $573 had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$2.0M

61% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

38%

$1.1M scored (56% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$698K

$91K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$784K

$783K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $573 has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
House Majority PAC $28K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$500K	$414K / $2K
Congressional Leadership Fund $75K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$500K	$1K / $405K
Senate Majority PAC $500K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$500K	$0 / $0
Senate Leadership Fund $180K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$500K	$12K / $290K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Fanduel Inc.'s money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Fanduel Inc.'s share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Sherrod Brown	Ohio Senate (special)	Attacking	$84K	✗ No
Josh Turek	Iowa Senate	Attacking	$44K	✗ No
Abdul El-Sayed	Michigan Senate	Attacking	$42K	✗ No
Troy Jackson	Maine Senate	Attacking	$34K	✗ No
Christina Hines	Michigan 10th District	Attacking	$28K	✗ No
Scott Singer	Florida 25th District	Attacking	$28K	✓ Yes
Roy Cooper	North Carolina Senate	Attacking	$27K	✗ No
Don Davis	North Carolina 1st District	Attacking	$24K	✗ No
William Lawrence	Michigan 7th District	Attacking	$23K	✗ No
Tom Barrett	Michigan 7th District	Attacking	$23K	✓ Yes
Cait Conley	New York 17th District	Attacking	$21K	✗ No
Casey Askar	Florida 22nd District	Attacking	$20K	✓ Yes

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Fanduel Inc. spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: Fanduel Inc. gave $2.0M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 61% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 38% were on the winning side ($428K won, $698K lost, with $91K in races still being counted). $573 had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Fanduel Inc. fund in 2026?: House Majority PAC ($500K), Congressional Leadership Fund ($500K), Senate Majority PAC ($500K), Senate Leadership Fund ($500K).
Which candidates did Fanduel Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: against Sherrod Brown (Ohio Senate (special), about $84K, lost); against Josh Turek (Iowa Senate, about $44K, lost); against Abdul El-Sayed (Michigan Senate, about $42K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.