Which super PACs did Economic Opportunity Fund fund in 2026?

Senate Majority PAC ($27M), House Majority PAC ($5.0M), Nebraska Values PAC ($3.0M).

Which candidates did Economic Opportunity Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

against Pete Ricketts (Nebraska Senate, about $2.8M, lost); against Scott Singer (Florida 25th District, about $280K, won); against Tom Barrett (Michigan 7th District, about $227K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Economic Opportunity Fund

Company / nonprofit

6 reported gifts; 3 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Mixed results

Economic Opportunity Fund gave $35M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 58% were on the winning side ($4.2M won, $3.0M lost, with $550K in races still being counted). $3K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$35M

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

58%

$7.2M scored (20% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$3.0M

$550K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$27M

$27M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $3K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Senate Majority PAC $27M not allocated to tracked outside spending	$27M	$0 / $0
House Majority PAC $278K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$5.0M	$4.1M / $24K
Nebraska Values PAC	$3.0M	$27K / $3.0M

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Economic Opportunity Fund's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Economic Opportunity Fund's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Pete Ricketts	Nebraska Senate	Attacking	$2.8M	✗ No
Scott Singer	Florida 25th District	Attacking	$280K	✓ Yes
Tom Barrett	Michigan 7th District	Attacking	$227K	✓ Yes
Casey Askar	Florida 22nd District	Attacking	$204K	✓ Yes
Laurie Buckhout	North Carolina 1st District	Attacking	$185K	✓ Yes
Mike Bouchard Jr.	Michigan 10th District	Attacking	$183K	✓ Yes
Eric Flores	Texas 34th District	Attacking	$162K	✓ Yes
Dan Osborn	Nebraska Senate	Supporting	$151K	✗ No
Paul LePage	Maine 2nd District	Attacking	$150K	Counting
Derrick Van Orden	Wisconsin 3rd District	Attacking	$148K	✓ Yes
Mike Beltran	Florida 14th District	Attacking	$147K	✓ Yes
David Valadao	California 22nd District	Attacking	$144K	✓ Yes

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Economic Opportunity Fund spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: Economic Opportunity Fund gave $35M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 58% were on the winning side ($4.2M won, $3.0M lost, with $550K in races still being counted). $3K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Economic Opportunity Fund fund in 2026?: Senate Majority PAC ($27M), House Majority PAC ($5.0M), Nebraska Values PAC ($3.0M).
Which candidates did Economic Opportunity Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: against Pete Ricketts (Nebraska Senate, about $2.8M, lost); against Scott Singer (Florida 25th District, about $280K, won); against Tom Barrett (Michigan 7th District, about $227K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.