Which super PACs did David Siegel fund in 2026?

House Majority PAC ($650K), Senate Majority PAC ($500K), DCCC ($3K), NRCC ($399), DSCC ($125).

Which candidates did David Siegel's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

against Scott Singer (Florida 25th District, about $36K, won); against Tom Barrett (Michigan 7th District, about $30K, won); against Casey Askar (Florida 22nd District, about $27K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

David Siegel

Individual

Consultant, Self-Employed · New York

30 reported gifts; 5 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed winners

David Siegel gave $1.2M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 99% were on the winning side ($539K won, $3K lost, with $72K in races still being counted). $450 had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$1.2M

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

99%

$542K scored (47% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$3K

$72K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$540K

$539K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $450 has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A person writing checks from their own fortune. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
House Majority PAC $36K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$650K	$539K / $3K
Senate Majority PAC $500K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$500K	$0 / $0
DCCC $3K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$3K	$0 / $0
NRCC $399 not allocated to tracked outside spending	$399	$0 / $0
DSCC $125 not allocated to tracked outside spending	$125	$0 / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates David Siegel's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by David Siegel's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Scott Singer	Florida 25th District	Attacking	$36K	✓ Yes
Tom Barrett	Michigan 7th District	Attacking	$30K	✓ Yes
Casey Askar	Florida 22nd District	Attacking	$27K	✓ Yes
Laurie Buckhout	North Carolina 1st District	Attacking	$24K	✓ Yes
Mike Bouchard Jr.	Michigan 10th District	Attacking	$24K	✓ Yes
Eric Flores	Texas 34th District	Attacking	$21K	✓ Yes
Paul LePage	Maine 2nd District	Attacking	$19K	Counting
Derrick Van Orden	Wisconsin 3rd District	Attacking	$19K	✓ Yes
Mike Beltran	Florida 14th District	Attacking	$19K	✓ Yes
David Valadao	California 22nd District	Attacking	$19K	✓ Yes
Brian Fitzpatrick	Pennsylvania 1st District	Attacking	$18K	✓ Yes
John Braun	Washington 3rd District	Attacking	$18K	✓ Yes

Individual as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did David Siegel spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: David Siegel gave $1.2M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 99% were on the winning side ($539K won, $3K lost, with $72K in races still being counted). $450 had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did David Siegel fund in 2026?: House Majority PAC ($650K), Senate Majority PAC ($500K), DCCC ($3K), NRCC ($399), DSCC ($125).
Which candidates did David Siegel's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: against Scott Singer (Florida 25th District, about $36K, won); against Tom Barrett (Michigan 7th District, about $30K, won); against Casey Askar (Florida 22nd District, about $27K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.