← All donors

Donor

Better World Civic Trust

Company / nonprofit

Pennsylvania

10 reported gifts; 7 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed winners

Better World Civic Trust gave $6.6M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 95% were on the winning side ($2.9M won, $136K lost, with $1.6M in races still being counted). $503K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$6.6M

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

95%

$3.0M scored (46% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$136K

$1.6M still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$2.0M

$1.5M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $503K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
Somos PAC

$299K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$1.7M
$923K / $111K
Votevets

$656K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$1.6M
$811K / $20K
Protecting Alaska Fishermen

$15K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$1.5M
$0 / $0
Kentuckians Not Corruption$670K
$670K / $0
Senate Majority PAC

$500K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$500K
$0 / $0
Lcv Victory Fund$250K
$211K / $5K
Montana Voters PAC$250K
$250K / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Better World Civic Trust's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Better World Civic Trust's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Dan J. SullivanAlaska SenateAttacking$1.5MCounting
Ralph AlvaradoKentucky 6th DistrictAttacking$462K✓ Yes
Ashley HinsonIowa SenateAttacking$297K✓ Yes
Josh TurekIowa Senate (primary)Supporting$279K✓ Yes
Zach DemboKentucky 6th DistrictSupporting$215K✓ Yes
Aaron FlintMontana 1st DistrictAttacking$199K✓ Yes
James TalaricoTexas SenateSupporting$170K✓ Yes
Kamala HarrisPresidentSupporting$166KUnknown
Manny RutinelColorado 8th District (primary)Supporting$146K✓ Yes
Bobby PulidoTexas 15th DistrictSupporting$128K✓ Yes
Johnny GarciaTexas 35th DistrictSupporting$99K✓ Yes
Abdul El-SayedMichigan SenateSupporting$95K✓ Yes

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Better World Civic Trust spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?
Better World Civic Trust gave $6.6M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 95% were on the winning side ($2.9M won, $136K lost, with $1.6M in races still being counted). $503K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Better World Civic Trust fund in 2026?
Somos PAC ($1.7M), Votevets ($1.6M), Protecting Alaska Fishermen ($1.5M), Kentuckians Not Corruption ($670K), Senate Majority PAC ($500K).
Which candidates did Better World Civic Trust's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?
against Dan J. Sullivan (Alaska Senate, about $1.5M, pending); against Ralph Alvarado (Kentucky 6th District, about $462K, won); against Ashley Hinson (Iowa Senate, about $297K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.