Which super PACs did American Rights and Reform PAC, Inc. fund in 2026?

MAGA Inc. ($2.0M), America First Agriculture Action Inc. ($1.5M).

Which candidates did American Rights and Reform PAC, Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

against James Talarico (Texas Senate, about $139K, lost); against Abdul El-Sayed (Michigan Senate, about $89K, lost); against Sherrod Brown (Ohio Senate (special), about $68K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

American Rights and Reform PAC, Inc.

Another PAC

5 reported gifts; 2 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed losers

American Rights and Reform PAC, Inc. gave $3.5M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 0% were on the winning side ($3K won, $1.4M lost, with $166K in races still being counted). $4K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$3.5M

100% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

$1.4M scored (40% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$1.4M

$166K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$2.0M

$1.9M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $4K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	How the group spent it	Won / lost
MAGA Inc. $884K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$2.0M		$3K / $1.1M
America First Agriculture Action Inc. $1.1M not allocated to tracked outside spending	$1.5M		$0 / $374K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates American Rights and Reform PAC, Inc.'s money was spent for or against, pro-rated by American Rights and Reform PAC, Inc.'s share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
James Talarico	Texas Senate	Attacking	$139K	✗ No
Abdul El-Sayed	Michigan Senate	Attacking	$89K	✗ No
Sherrod Brown	Ohio Senate (special)	Attacking	$68K	✗ No
Bryan Steil	Wisconsin 1st District	Supporting	$60K	✗ No
Nick Begich III	Alaska at-large House seat	Supporting	$43K	Counting
Jared Moskowitz	Florida 25th District	Attacking	$42K	✗ No
Ken Paxton	Texas Senate	Supporting	$42K	✗ No
Juan Ciscomani	Arizona 6th District	Supporting	$41K	✗ No
Tom Barrett	Michigan 7th District	Supporting	$41K	✗ No
Rob Bresnahan	Pennsylvania 8th District	Supporting	$40K	✗ No
Kathy Castor	Florida 14th District	Attacking	$40K	✗ No
Mike Lawler	New York 17th District	Supporting	$37K	✗ No

Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did American Rights and Reform PAC, Inc. spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: American Rights and Reform PAC, Inc. gave $3.5M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 0% were on the winning side ($3K won, $1.4M lost, with $166K in races still being counted). $4K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did American Rights and Reform PAC, Inc. fund in 2026?: MAGA Inc. ($2.0M), America First Agriculture Action Inc. ($1.5M).
Which candidates did American Rights and Reform PAC, Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: against James Talarico (Texas Senate, about $139K, lost); against Abdul El-Sayed (Michigan Senate, about $89K, lost); against Sherrod Brown (Ohio Senate (special), about $68K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.