← All donors

Donor

Way to Lead PAC

Another PAC

Arizona

18 reported gifts; 11 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed losers

Way to Lead PAC gave $1.4M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 15% were on the winning side ($59K won, $343K lost). $114K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$1.4M

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

15%

$402K scored (30% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$343K

Not allocated or result unknown

$958K

$844K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $114K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
Wfp National PAC

$395K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$550K
$9K / $113K
For Our Future

$28K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$200K
$30K / $142K
Victory PAC

$116K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$150K
$0 / $240
Worker Power PAC

$96K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$125K
$9K / $16K
Planned Parenthood Votes

$83K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$100K
$3K / $8K
Retire Career Politicians

$3K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$50K
$0 / $45K
Justice Democrats PAC

$29K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$50K
$502 / $7K
Moveon.Org Political Action

$47K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$50K
$13 / $447
Community Change Voters

$25K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$50K
$5K / $2K
Casa in Action PAC

$15K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$25K
$1K / $7K
Workers Vote

$7K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$10K
$1K / $2K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Way to Lead PAC's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Way to Lead PAC's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Kamala HarrisPresidentSupporting$192K✗ No
Raquel TeranArizona 3rd District (primary)Supporting$40KUnknown
Robert P. Casey Jr.Pennsylvania SenateSupporting$34K✗ No
Dan OsbornNebraska SenateSupporting$25K✗ No
Joseph BidenPresidentSupporting$25KUnknown
Cori BushMissouri 1st District (primary)Supporting$23KUnknown
Deb FischerNebraska SenateAttacking$20K✗ No
Sue AltmanNew Jersey 7th DistrictSupporting$16K✗ No
Elissa SlotkinMichigan SenateSupporting$14K✓ Yes
George S. LatimerNew York 16th District (primary)Attacking$14K✗ No
Jamaal BowmanNew York 16th District (primary)Supporting$12KUnknown
Donald TrumpPresidentAttacking$12K✗ No

Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Way to Lead PAC spend on the 2024 elections, and did it win?
Way to Lead PAC gave $1.4M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 15% were on the winning side ($59K won, $343K lost). $114K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Way to Lead PAC fund in 2024?
Wfp National PAC ($550K), For Our Future ($200K), Victory PAC ($150K), Worker Power PAC ($125K), Planned Parenthood Votes ($100K).
Which candidates did Way to Lead PAC's money end up backing or attacking in 2024?
for Kamala Harris (President, about $192K, lost); for Raquel Teran (Arizona 3rd District, about $40K, unknown); for Robert P. Casey Jr. (Pennsylvania Senate, about $34K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.