Which super PACs did Stanley Druckenmiller fund in 2024?

Americans for Prosperity Action ($1.5M), SFA Fund ($700K), Tell It Like It Is PAC ($250K), Trust in the Mission PAC ($150K).

Which candidates did Stanley Druckenmiller's money end up backing or attacking in 2024?

for Nikki Haley (President, about $670K, unknown); against Ron Desantis (President, about $192K, unknown); against Donald Trump (President, about $171K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Stanley Druckenmiller

Individual

Chairman CEO and Chief Investment of, Duquesne Family Office · New York

6 reported gifts; 4 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Limited result coverage

Stanley Druckenmiller gave $2.6M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 55% were on the winning side ($543K won, $450K lost). $1.1M had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$2.6M

100% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

55%

$993K scored (38% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$450K

Not allocated or result unknown

$1.6M

$467K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $1.1M has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A person writing checks from their own fortune. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Americans for Prosperity Action $253K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$1.5M	$543K / $361K
SFA Fund $56K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$700K	$0 / $36K
Tell It Like It Is PAC $111K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$250K	$0 / $53K
Trust in the Mission PAC $48K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$150K	$0 / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Stanley Druckenmiller's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Stanley Druckenmiller's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Nikki Haley	President (primary)	Supporting	$670K	Unknown
Ron Desantis	President (primary)	Attacking	$192K	Unknown
Donald Trump	President (primary)	Attacking	$171K	✗ No
Bernard F. Moreno	Ohio Senate	Supporting	$104K	✓ Yes
Timothy Scott	President (primary)	Supporting	$102K	Unknown
Dave McCormick	Pennsylvania Senate	Supporting	$96K	✓ Yes
Christopher Christie	President (primary)	Supporting	$87K	Unknown
Joseph Biden	President (primary)	Attacking	$79K	Unknown
Sherrod Brown	Ohio Senate	Attacking	$62K	✓ Yes
Robert P. Casey Jr.	Pennsylvania Senate	Attacking	$53K	✓ Yes
Mike Rogers	Michigan Senate	Supporting	$52K	✗ No
Elissa Slotkin	Michigan Senate	Attacking	$44K	✗ No

Individual as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Stanley Druckenmiller spend on the 2024 elections, and did it win?: Stanley Druckenmiller gave $2.6M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 55% were on the winning side ($543K won, $450K lost). $1.1M had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Stanley Druckenmiller fund in 2024?: Americans for Prosperity Action ($1.5M), SFA Fund ($700K), Tell It Like It Is PAC ($250K), Trust in the Mission PAC ($150K).
Which candidates did Stanley Druckenmiller's money end up backing or attacking in 2024?: for Nikki Haley (President, about $670K, unknown); against Ron Desantis (President, about $192K, unknown); against Donald Trump (President, about $171K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.