Which super PACs did Institute for Responsive Government Action, Inc. fund in 2024?

Your Community PAC ($975K), Retire Career Politicians ($500K).

Which candidates did Institute for Responsive Government Action, Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2024?

for Kamala Harris (President, about $580K, lost); for Dan Osborn (Nebraska Senate, about $252K, lost); against Deb Fischer (Nebraska Senate, about $195K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Institute for Responsive Government Action, Inc.

Company / nonprofit

Illinois

4 reported gifts; 2 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed losers

Institute for Responsive Government Action, Inc. gave $1.5M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 0% were on the winning side ($0 won, $1.3M lost). $18K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$1.5M

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

$1.3M scored (89% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$1.3M

Not allocated or result unknown

$162K

$144K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $18K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched

Group	Gave	How the group spent it	Won / lost
Your Community PAC $109K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$975K		$0 / $866K
Retire Career Politicians $35K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$500K		$0 / $447K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Institute for Responsive Government Action, Inc.'s money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Institute for Responsive Government Action, Inc.'s share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Kamala Harris	President	Supporting	$580K	✗ No
Dan Osborn	Nebraska Senate	Supporting	$252K	✗ No
Deb Fischer	Nebraska Senate	Attacking	$195K	✗ No
Jon Tester	Montana Senate	Supporting	$81K	✗ No
Carl J. Marlinga	Michigan 10th District	Supporting	$64K	✗ No
Derrick Van Orden	Wisconsin 3rd District	Attacking	$44K	✗ No
Zach Nunn	Iowa 3rd District	Attacking	$41K	✗ No
Bernard F. Moreno	Ohio Senate	Attacking	$27K	✗ No
Monica Tranel	Montana 1st District	Supporting	$19K	✗ No
Robert Kennedy	President	Supporting	$12K	Unknown
Don Bacon	Nebraska 2nd District	Attacking	$9K	✗ No
Chase Oliver	President	Supporting	$6K	Unknown

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Institute for Responsive Government Action, Inc. spend on the 2024 elections, and did it win?: Institute for Responsive Government Action, Inc. gave $1.5M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 0% were on the winning side ($0 won, $1.3M lost). $18K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Institute for Responsive Government Action, Inc. fund in 2024?: Your Community PAC ($975K), Retire Career Politicians ($500K).
Which candidates did Institute for Responsive Government Action, Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2024?: for Kamala Harris (President, about $580K, lost); for Dan Osborn (Nebraska Senate, about $252K, lost); against Deb Fischer (Nebraska Senate, about $195K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.