Which super PACs did Club for Growth Action fund in 2024?

Win It Back PAC ($35M), Conservative Outsider PAC Inc ($5.2M), Savecalifornianow ($1.2M), Project Rescue America ($10K).

Which candidates did Club for Growth Action's money end up backing or attacking in 2024?

against Ruben Gallego (Arizona Senate, about $8.3M, lost); against Jacky S. Rosen (Nevada Senate, about $6.9M, lost); against Colin Allred (Texas Senate, about $5.3M, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Club for Growth Action

Another PAC

32 reported gifts; 4 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed losers

Club for Growth Action gave $42M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 92% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 27% were on the winning side ($8.7M won, $24M lost). $4.5M had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$42M

92% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

27%

$32M scored (77% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$24M

Not allocated or result unknown

$9.5M

$5.0M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $4.5M has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Win It Back PAC $4.6M not allocated to tracked outside spending	$35M	$8.7M / $21M
Conservative Outsider PAC Inc $248K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$5.2M	$23K / $2.1M
Savecalifornianow $142K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$1.2M	$0 / $1.1M
Project Rescue America $2K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$10K	$8K / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Club for Growth Action's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Club for Growth Action's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Ruben Gallego	Arizona Senate	Attacking	$8.3M	✗ No
Jacky S. Rosen	Nevada Senate	Attacking	$6.9M	✗ No
Colin Allred	Texas Senate	Attacking	$5.3M	✓ Yes
Donald Trump	President	Attacking	$2.6M	✗ No
John J. McGuire III	Virginia 5th District (primary)	Attacking	$2.1M	✗ No
Brent Hatch	Utah Senate	Supporting	$1.8M	Unknown
Janelle Stelson	Pennsylvania 10th District	Attacking	$1.6M	✓ Yes
Donald Trump	President (primary)	Attacking	$1.1M	✗ No
Scott Baugh	California 47th District	Supporting	$1.0M	✗ No
Robert G. Good	Virginia 5th District (primary)	Supporting	$978K	Unknown
Dave Min	California 47th District	Attacking	$767K	✗ No
Catherine Templeton	South Carolina 1st District (primary)	Attacking	$655K	Unknown

Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Club for Growth Action spend on the 2024 elections, and did it win?: Club for Growth Action gave $42M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 92% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 27% were on the winning side ($8.7M won, $24M lost). $4.5M had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Club for Growth Action fund in 2024?: Win It Back PAC ($35M), Conservative Outsider PAC Inc ($5.2M), Savecalifornianow ($1.2M), Project Rescue America ($10K).
Which candidates did Club for Growth Action's money end up backing or attacking in 2024?: against Ruben Gallego (Arizona Senate, about $8.3M, lost); against Jacky S. Rosen (Nevada Senate, about $6.9M, lost); against Colin Allred (Texas Senate, about $5.3M, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.