Which super PACs did West Realm Shires Services Inc. fund in 2022?

Senate Leadership Fund ($1.0M), Congressional Leadership Fund ($750K), Alabama Conservatives Fund ($100K).

Which candidates did West Realm Shires Services Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2022?

against John K. Fetterman (Pennsylvania Senate, about $161K, lost); against Raphael Warnock (Georgia Senate, about $153K, lost); against Cheri Beasley (North Carolina Senate, about $129K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

West Realm Shires Services Inc.

Company / nonprofit

Illinois

3 reported gifts; 3 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Mixed results

West Realm Shires Services Inc. gave $1.9M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 43% were on the winning side ($671K won, $879K lost). $14K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$1.9M

99% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

43%

$1.6M scored (84% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$879K

Not allocated or result unknown

$300K

$286K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $14K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Senate Leadership Fund $167K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$1.0M	$348K / $485K
Congressional Leadership Fund $98K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$750K	$244K / $394K
Alabama Conservatives Fund $21K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$100K	$79K / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates West Realm Shires Services Inc.'s money was spent for or against, pro-rated by West Realm Shires Services Inc.'s share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
John K. Fetterman	Pennsylvania Senate	Attacking	$161K	✗ No
Raphael Warnock	Georgia Senate	Attacking	$153K	✗ No
Cheri Beasley	North Carolina Senate	Attacking	$129K	✓ Yes
Tim Ryan	Ohio Senate	Attacking	$110K	✓ Yes
Mandela Barnes	Wisconsin Senate	Attacking	$88K	✓ Yes
Catherine Cortez Masto	Nevada Senate	Attacking	$87K	✗ No
Katie Britt	Alabama Senate (primary)	Supporting	$58K	✓ Yes
Donald C. Bolduc	New Hampshire Senate	Supporting	$31K	✗ No
Susie Lee	Nevada 3rd District	Attacking	$31K	✗ No
Herschel Junior Walker	Georgia Senate	Supporting	$30K	✗ No
Dina Titus	Nevada 1st District	Attacking	$25K	✗ No
Susan Wild	Pennsylvania 7th District	Attacking	$23K	✗ No

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did West Realm Shires Services Inc. spend on the 2022 elections, and did it win?: West Realm Shires Services Inc. gave $1.9M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 43% were on the winning side ($671K won, $879K lost). $14K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did West Realm Shires Services Inc. fund in 2022?: Senate Leadership Fund ($1.0M), Congressional Leadership Fund ($750K), Alabama Conservatives Fund ($100K).
Which candidates did West Realm Shires Services Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2022?: against John K. Fetterman (Pennsylvania Senate, about $161K, lost); against Raphael Warnock (Georgia Senate, about $153K, lost); against Cheri Beasley (North Carolina Senate, about $129K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.