Which super PACs did Nea Advocacy Fund fund in 2022?

House Majority PAC ($2.1M), Senate Majority PAC ($1.8M), Workers Vote ($450K), Black PAC ($200K), Family Friendly Action PAC ($100K).

Which candidates did Nea Advocacy Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2022?

against Mehmet Oz (Pennsylvania Senate, about $286K, won); against Ron Johnson (Wisconsin Senate, about $174K, lost); against Adam Paul Laxalt (Nevada Senate, about $173K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Nea Advocacy Fund

Another PAC

11 gifts to 6 groups, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Winner

Nea Advocacy Fund gave $4.8M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Dec 31, 2022). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 79% ended up on the winning side ($2.5M won, $678K lost).

Gave to outside spenders

$4.8M

100% of it helped Democrats

Ended up on the winning side

79%

$2.5M of the dollars in races already called

Spent on the losing side

$678K

Not spent yet

$1.6M

Sitting with groups that have not spent

Where the cheques went

Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
House Majority PAC $363K not spent yet	$2.1M	$1.3M / $382K
Senate Majority PAC $721K not spent yet	$1.8M	$824K / $255K
Workers Vote $362K not spent yet	$450K	$88K / $179
Black PAC $81K not spent yet	$200K	$114K / $4K
Family Friendly Action PAC $28K not spent yet	$100K	$51K / $21K
Women Vote! $13K not spent yet	$100K	$67K / $17K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Nea Advocacy Fund's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Nea Advocacy Fund's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Mehmet Oz	Pennsylvania Senate	Attacking	$286K	✓ Yes
Ron Johnson	Wisconsin Senate (primary)	Attacking	$174K	✗ No
Adam Paul Laxalt	Nevada Senate	Attacking	$173K	✓ Yes
Blake Masters	Arizona Senate	Attacking	$168K	✓ Yes
Raphael Warnock	Georgia Senate	Supporting	$130K	✓ Yes
John K. Fetterman	Pennsylvania Senate	Supporting	$120K	✓ Yes
Ted Budd	North Carolina Senate	Attacking	$83K	✗ No
Catherine Cortez Masto	Nevada Senate	Supporting	$80K	✓ Yes
Mark Robertson	Nevada 1st District	Attacking	$65K	✓ Yes
Donald C. Bolduc	New Hampshire Senate	Attacking	$64K	✓ Yes
Cassy Garcia	Texas 28th District	Attacking	$57K	✓ Yes
Yesli I. Vega	Virginia 7th District	Attacking	$56K	✓ Yes

Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Nea Advocacy Fund spend on the 2022 elections, and did it win?: Nea Advocacy Fund gave $4.8M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Dec 31, 2022). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 79% ended up on the winning side ($2.5M won, $678K lost).
Which super PACs did Nea Advocacy Fund fund in 2022?: House Majority PAC ($2.1M), Senate Majority PAC ($1.8M), Workers Vote ($450K), Black PAC ($200K), Family Friendly Action PAC ($100K).
Which candidates did Nea Advocacy Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2022?: against Mehmet Oz (Pennsylvania Senate, about $286K, won); against Ron Johnson (Wisconsin Senate, about $174K, lost); against Adam Paul Laxalt (Nevada Senate, about $173K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.