Which super PACs did Opportunity Matters Fund Inc. fund in 2022?

Opportunity Matters Fund Action ($7.3M), Senate Leadership Fund ($5.5M), National Victory Action Fund ($1.0M).

Which candidates did Opportunity Matters Fund Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2022?

against John K. Fetterman (Pennsylvania Senate, about $882K, lost); against Raphael Warnock (Georgia Senate, about $838K, lost); for Herschel Junior Walker (Georgia Senate, about $762K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Opportunity Matters Fund Inc.

Another PAC

Massachusetts

5 reported gifts; 3 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Mixed results

Opportunity Matters Fund Inc. gave $14M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 44% were on the winning side ($3.5M won, $4.4M lost). $53K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$14M

99% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

44%

$8.0M scored (58% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$4.4M

Not allocated or result unknown

$5.7M

$5.7M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $53K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Opportunity Matters Fund Action $4.0M not allocated to tracked outside spending	$7.3M	$1.5M / $1.7M
Senate Leadership Fund $914K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$5.5M	$1.9M / $2.7M
National Victory Action Fund $738K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$1.0M	$160K / $49K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Opportunity Matters Fund Inc.'s money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Opportunity Matters Fund Inc.'s share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
John K. Fetterman	Pennsylvania Senate	Attacking	$882K	✗ No
Raphael Warnock	Georgia Senate	Attacking	$838K	✗ No
Herschel Junior Walker	Georgia Senate	Supporting	$762K	✗ No
Cheri Beasley	North Carolina Senate	Attacking	$706K	✓ Yes
Tim Ryan	Ohio Senate	Attacking	$603K	✓ Yes
Mehmet Oz	Pennsylvania Senate	Supporting	$520K	✗ No
Ron Johnson	Wisconsin Senate	Supporting	$493K	✓ Yes
Mandela Barnes	Wisconsin Senate	Attacking	$484K	✓ Yes
Catherine Cortez Masto	Nevada Senate	Attacking	$475K	✗ No
Ted Budd	North Carolina Senate	Supporting	$395K	✓ Yes
Adam Paul Laxalt	Nevada Senate	Supporting	$356K	✗ No
Tim Scott	South Carolina Senate (primary)	Supporting	$301K	✓ Yes

Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Opportunity Matters Fund Inc. spend on the 2022 elections, and did it win?: Opportunity Matters Fund Inc. gave $14M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 44% were on the winning side ($3.5M won, $4.4M lost). $53K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Opportunity Matters Fund Inc. fund in 2022?: Opportunity Matters Fund Action ($7.3M), Senate Leadership Fund ($5.5M), National Victory Action Fund ($1.0M).
Which candidates did Opportunity Matters Fund Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2022?: against John K. Fetterman (Pennsylvania Senate, about $882K, lost); against Raphael Warnock (Georgia Senate, about $838K, lost); for Herschel Junior Walker (Georgia Senate, about $762K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.