Which super PACs did Melaleuca Inc. fund in 2022?

Senate Leadership Fund ($3.0M), Congressional Leadership Fund ($2.6M), Florida First Project ($200K), Defending Main Street Superpac Inc. ($100K).

Which candidates did Melaleuca Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2022?

against John K. Fetterman (Pennsylvania Senate, about $475K, lost); against Raphael Warnock (Georgia Senate, about $451K, lost); against Cheri Beasley (North Carolina Senate, about $380K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Melaleuca Inc.

Company / nonprofit

Idaho

12 reported gifts; 4 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Mixed results

Melaleuca Inc. gave $5.9M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 41% were on the winning side ($2.0M won, $2.9M lost). $70K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$5.9M

99% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

41%

$4.9M scored (84% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$2.9M

Not allocated or result unknown

$957K

$887K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $70K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Senate Leadership Fund $493K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$3.0M	$1.0M / $1.4M
Congressional Leadership Fund $346K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$2.6M	$861K / $1.4M
Florida First Project $39K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$200K	$74K / $87K
Defending Main Street Superpac Inc. $10K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$100K	$43K / $27K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Melaleuca Inc.'s money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Melaleuca Inc.'s share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
John K. Fetterman	Pennsylvania Senate	Attacking	$475K	✗ No
Raphael Warnock	Georgia Senate	Attacking	$451K	✗ No
Cheri Beasley	North Carolina Senate	Attacking	$380K	✓ Yes
Tim Ryan	Ohio Senate	Attacking	$325K	✓ Yes
Mandela Barnes	Wisconsin Senate	Attacking	$261K	✓ Yes
Catherine Cortez Masto	Nevada Senate	Attacking	$256K	✗ No
Susie Lee	Nevada 3rd District	Attacking	$110K	✗ No
Donald C. Bolduc	New Hampshire Senate	Supporting	$93K	✗ No
Dina Titus	Nevada 1st District	Attacking	$88K	✗ No
Val Demings	Florida Senate (primary)	Attacking	$87K	✗ No
Herschel Junior Walker	Georgia Senate	Supporting	$87K	✗ No
Susan Wild	Pennsylvania 7th District	Attacking	$81K	✗ No

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Melaleuca Inc. spend on the 2022 elections, and did it win?: Melaleuca Inc. gave $5.9M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 41% were on the winning side ($2.0M won, $2.9M lost). $70K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Melaleuca Inc. fund in 2022?: Senate Leadership Fund ($3.0M), Congressional Leadership Fund ($2.6M), Florida First Project ($200K), Defending Main Street Superpac Inc. ($100K).
Which candidates did Melaleuca Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2022?: against John K. Fetterman (Pennsylvania Senate, about $475K, lost); against Raphael Warnock (Georgia Senate, about $451K, lost); against Cheri Beasley (North Carolina Senate, about $380K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.