Which super PACs did Honeywell International Political Action Committee fund in 2022?

Senate Leadership Fund ($250K), Congressional Leadership Fund ($250K), Center Forward Committee ($150K).

Donor

Honeywell International Political Action Committee

Another PAC

3 reported gifts; 3 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Mixed results

Honeywell International Political Action Committee gave $650K to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 77% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 45% were on the winning side ($249K won, $298K lost). $14K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$650K

77% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

45%

$547K scored (84% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$298K

Not allocated or result unknown

$103K

$89K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $14K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Senate Leadership Fund $42K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$250K	$87K / $121K
Congressional Leadership Fund $33K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$250K	$81K / $131K
Center Forward Committee $14K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$150K	$80K / $46K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Honeywell International Political Action Committee's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Honeywell International Political Action Committee's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
John K. Fetterman	Pennsylvania Senate	Attacking	$40K	✗ No
Raphael Warnock	Georgia Senate	Attacking	$38K	✗ No
Cheri Beasley	North Carolina Senate	Attacking	$32K	✓ Yes
Tim Ryan	Ohio Senate	Attacking	$28K	✓ Yes
Mandela Barnes	Wisconsin Senate	Attacking	$22K	✓ Yes
Catherine Cortez Masto	Nevada Senate	Attacking	$22K	✗ No
Jamie McLeod-Skinner	Oregon 5th District (primary)	Attacking	$16K	✗ No
Derrick Van Orden	Wisconsin 3rd District	Attacking	$15K	✗ No
Susie Lee	Nevada 3rd District	Attacking	$10K	✗ No
Matt Larkin	Washington 8th District	Attacking	$10K	✓ Yes
Tyler Kistner	Minnesota 2nd District	Attacking	$10K	✓ Yes
Kurt Schrader	Oregon 5th District (primary)	Supporting	$10K	Unknown

Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Honeywell International Political Action Committee spend on the 2022 elections, and did it win?: Honeywell International Political Action Committee gave $650K to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 77% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 45% were on the winning side ($249K won, $298K lost). $14K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Honeywell International Political Action Committee fund in 2022?: Senate Leadership Fund ($250K), Congressional Leadership Fund ($250K), Center Forward Committee ($150K).
Which candidates did Honeywell International Political Action Committee's money end up backing or attacking in 2022?: against John K. Fetterman (Pennsylvania Senate, about $40K, lost); against Raphael Warnock (Georgia Senate, about $38K, lost); against Cheri Beasley (North Carolina Senate, about $32K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.