Which super PACs did David Trone fund in 2022?

House Majority PAC ($555K), Votevets ($100K), Penn Progress, Inc. ($50K), DCCC ($37K), Senate Majority PAC ($20K).

Which candidates did David Trone's money end up backing or attacking in 2022?

for Conor Lamb (Pennsylvania Senate, about $35K, unknown); against Herschel Junior Walker (Georgia Senate, about $19K, won); against Mark Robertson (Nevada 1st District, about $17K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

David Trone

Individual

Congressman, U.S. House of Representatives · Maryland

10 reported gifts; 5 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed winners

David Trone gave $762K to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 76% were on the winning side ($387K won, $121K lost). $39K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$762K

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

76%

$509K scored (67% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$121K

Not allocated or result unknown

$253K

$214K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $39K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A person writing checks from their own fortune. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
House Majority PAC $113K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$555K	$342K / $97K
Votevets $48K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$100K	$32K / $20K
Penn Progress, Inc. $15K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$50K	$0 / $0
DCCC $27K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$37K	$7K / $2K
Senate Majority PAC $11K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$20K	$7K / $2K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates David Trone's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by David Trone's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Conor Lamb	Pennsylvania Senate (primary)	Supporting	$35K	Unknown
Herschel Junior Walker	Georgia Senate	Attacking	$19K	✓ Yes
Mark Robertson	Nevada 1st District	Attacking	$17K	✓ Yes
Tom Barrett	Michigan 7th District	Attacking	$15K	✓ Yes
Yesli I. Vega	Virginia 7th District	Attacking	$15K	✓ Yes
Cassy Garcia	Texas 28th District	Attacking	$15K	✓ Yes
Jeremy Shaffer	Pennsylvania 17th District	Attacking	$15K	✓ Yes
Karoline Leavitt	New Hampshire 1st District	Attacking	$14K	✓ Yes
Lisa Scheller	Pennsylvania 7th District	Attacking	$14K	✓ Yes
David G. Valadao	California 22nd District	Attacking	$13K	✗ No
Tyler Kistner	Minnesota 2nd District	Attacking	$13K	✓ Yes
Bruce Poliquin	Maine 2nd District	Attacking	$13K	✓ Yes

Individual as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did David Trone spend on the 2022 elections, and did it win?: David Trone gave $762K to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 76% were on the winning side ($387K won, $121K lost). $39K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did David Trone fund in 2022?: House Majority PAC ($555K), Votevets ($100K), Penn Progress, Inc. ($50K), DCCC ($37K), Senate Majority PAC ($20K).
Which candidates did David Trone's money end up backing or attacking in 2022?: for Conor Lamb (Pennsylvania Senate, about $35K, unknown); against Herschel Junior Walker (Georgia Senate, about $19K, won); against Mark Robertson (Nevada 1st District, about $17K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.