← All donors

Donor

One Nation

Dark money

Virginia

3 reported gifts; 1 recipient group listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Mixed results

One Nation gave $22M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2020 federal elections, and 97% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 56% were on the winning side ($7.7M won, $6.0M lost). $7K had no matched result and is excluded.

Nonprofit tied to the Senate Leadership Fund. It does not disclose its donors.

Gave to outside spenders

$22M

97% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

56%

$14M scored (61% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$6.0M

Not allocated or result unknown

$8.8M

$8.8M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $7K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the trail ends

What the IRS sees

The matched IRS record is One Nation, a 501(c)(4) social welfare group based in Haymarket, VA. The figures below are organization-level Form 990 amounts. Name matching alone does not establish that every FEC donation came from this entity; review the linked filing and EIN.
IRS filings on ProPublica →

Revenue, 2023

$67M

total reported revenue, including sources other than donations

Spent, 2023

$14M

Assets at year end, 2023

$61M

Tax yearRevenueSpentAssetsFiling
2023$67M$14M$61M990 PDF
2022$125M$156M$8.2M990 PDF
2021$65M$37M$39M990 PDF
2020$172M$196M$12M990 PDF
2019$49M$21M$36Me-file
2018$58M$64M$6.9M990 PDF
2024filed, not yet digitized990 PDF

The $22M it gave to super PACs in 2020 is 34% of what it took in during 2023, its latest year on file. The 990 lists what it spent on politics in a single line and leaves every donor blank.

One Nation also bought $2.6M of Google and YouTube ads under its own name this cycle. All ad buyers →

Where the checks went

A nonprofit that does not have to say where its own money came from. The trail ends here. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
Senate Leadership Fund

$8.8M not allocated to tracked outside spending

$22M
$7.7M / $6.0M

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates One Nation's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by One Nation's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Jon OssoffGeorgia SenateAttacking$4.0M✗ No
Cal CunninghamNorth Carolina SenateAttacking$2.2M✓ Yes
Steve BullockMontana SenateAttacking$1.1M✓ Yes
Theresa GreenfieldIowa SenateAttacking$921K✓ Yes
Gary PetersMichigan SenateAttacking$816K✗ No
Jaime HarrisonSouth Carolina SenateAttacking$759K✓ Yes
Barbara BollierKansas SenateAttacking$727K✓ Yes
Mark KellyArizona SenateAttacking$693K✗ No
Sara I. GideonMaine SenateAttacking$583K✓ Yes
Joni ErnstIowa SenateSupporting$566K✓ Yes
John W. HickenlooperColorado SenateAttacking$376K✗ No
David A. PerdueGeorgia SenateAttacking$338K✓ Yes

Dark money as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did One Nation spend on the 2020 elections, and did it win?
One Nation gave $22M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2020 federal elections, and 97% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 56% were on the winning side ($7.7M won, $6.0M lost). $7K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did One Nation fund in 2020?
Senate Leadership Fund ($22M).
Which candidates did One Nation's money end up backing or attacking in 2020?
against Jon Ossoff (Georgia Senate, about $4.0M, lost); against Cal Cunningham (North Carolina Senate, about $2.2M, won); against Steve Bullock (Montana Senate, about $1.1M, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.