← All donors

Donor

Daniel Loeb

Individual

CEO, Third Point LLC · New York

17 reported gifts; 11 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Mixed results

Daniel Loeb gave $2.4M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2020 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 39% were on the winning side ($605K won, $937K lost). $125K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$2.4M

99% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

39%

$1.5M scored (64% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$937K

Not allocated or result unknown

$870K

$745K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $125K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A person writing checks from their own fortune. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
Senate Leadership Fund

$312K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$800K
$273K / $215K
Better Future Mi Fund

$37K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$350K
$0 / $313K
American Patriots PAC

$77K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$300K
$19K / $102K
Congressional Leadership Fund

$43K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$300K
$200K / $37K
Opportunity Matters Fund, Inc.

$135K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$300K
$95K / $71K
Americans for Tomorrow's Future

$26K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$125K
$0 / $99K
National Victory Action Fund

$57K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$100K
$1K / $42K
Esafund

$34K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$100K
$9K / $53K
NRSC

$23K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$36K
$7K / $5K
DCCC

$359 not allocated to tracked outside spending

$484
$21 / $104
DSCC

$176 not allocated to tracked outside spending

$250
$12 / $62

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Daniel Loeb's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Daniel Loeb's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Gary PetersMichigan SenateAttacking$292K✗ No
Jon OssoffGeorgia SenateAttacking$152K✗ No
Raphael WarnockGeorgia Senate (special)Attacking$117K✗ No
Ilhan OmarMinnesota 5th District (primary)Attacking$99K✗ No
Jason ChurchWisconsin 7th District (primary)Supporting$83KUnknown
Cal CunninghamNorth Carolina SenateAttacking$80K✓ Yes
David A. PerdueGeorgia SenateSupporting$56K✗ No
Lindsey GrahamSouth Carolina SenateSupporting$52K✓ Yes
Kelly LoefflerGeorgia Senate (special)Supporting$49K✗ No
Steve BullockMontana SenateAttacking$42K✓ Yes
Gary PetersMichigan Senate (primary)Attacking$41K✗ No
Theresa GreenfieldIowa SenateAttacking$36K✓ Yes

Individual as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Daniel Loeb spend on the 2020 elections, and did it win?
Daniel Loeb gave $2.4M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2020 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 39% were on the winning side ($605K won, $937K lost). $125K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Daniel Loeb fund in 2020?
Senate Leadership Fund ($800K), Better Future Mi Fund ($350K), American Patriots PAC ($300K), Congressional Leadership Fund ($300K), Opportunity Matters Fund, Inc. ($300K).
Which candidates did Daniel Loeb's money end up backing or attacking in 2020?
against Gary Peters (Michigan Senate, about $292K, lost); against Jon Ossoff (Georgia Senate, about $152K, lost); against Raphael Warnock (Georgia Senate (special), about $117K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.